Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Nov:26 Suppl 1:e14315.
doi: 10.1111/tid.14315. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

Surveillance for donor-derived infections in Australia

Affiliations
Review

Surveillance for donor-derived infections in Australia

Helen Ingrid Opdam et al. Transpl Infect Dis. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Systems for quality and safety assurance in organ donation and transplantation are vital, especially those that seek to minimize donor disease transmission. Australia has developed a national vigilance and surveillance system to identify, review, and analyze actual and potential donor-derived infections and other disease transmissions.

Methods: The system involves notification of incidents to the Australian Organ and Tissue Authority for review by a Vigilance and Surveillance Expert Advisory Committee (VSEAC). The VSEAC grades incidents, O makes recommendations, and issues communications both publicly and to the clinical donation and transplant sector.

Results: Annual notifications have increased since the inception of the system in 2012 until 2022. The vast majority relate to procedural aspects including donor assessment, information/data issues, and the recovery, offer, allocation, preservation and transportation of organs. Possible donor-derived disease accounted for 19% of all notifications, and those related to possible donor-derived infection only 12%. The VSEAC, as a result of reviewing these incidents, has made recommendations resulting in revisions to donor screening, organ allocation, packaging and transportation. The review of incidents has led to changes in clinical guidance for increased viral risk donor assessment, testing, and ensuing organ utilization and recipient surveillance. Guidance has also been reviewed for other infectious risks including strongyloides, human T-lymphotropic virus, and HEV.

Conclusion: The Australian vigilance and surveillance system has enabled national retrospective reporting and evaluation of serious adverse events or reactions to identify trends and inform processes and guidelines, therefore improving the safety of donation and transplantation.

Keywords: donation; donor‐derived; infection; surveillance; transplantation; vigilance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Shingde R, Habachou LI, Calisa V, et al. Unexpected donor‐derived infectious transmissions by kidney transplantation: a systematic review. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2018;20:e12851. doi:10.1111/tid.12851
    1. Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation (GODT). Accessed March 6, 2024. https://www.transplant‐observatory.org/
    1. Notify Library. The Global Vigilance and Surveillance Database for Medical Products of Human Origin. Accessed February 25, 2024. https://www.notifylibrary.org/content/notify‐project
    1. Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority, Strategy 2022–2027. Accessed February 25, 2024. https://www.donatelife.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022‐08/OTA%20Strategy...
    1. Sixty‐third World Health Assembly Human organ and tissue transplantation resolution WHA63.22. 21 May 2010. Accessed February 25, 2024. https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA63/A63_R22‐en.pdf

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources