Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jul 29;379(1906):20230237.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0237. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

Synapses tagged, memories kept: synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis in brain health and disease

Affiliations
Review

Synapses tagged, memories kept: synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis in brain health and disease

Mohammad Zaki Bin Ibrahim et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

The synaptic tagging and capture (STC) hypothesis lays the framework on the synapse-specific mechanism of protein synthesis-dependent long-term plasticity upon synaptic induction. Activated synapses will display a transient tag that will capture plasticity-related products (PRPs). These two events, tag setting and PRP synthesis, can be teased apart and have been studied extensively-from their electrophysiological and pharmacological properties to the molecular events involved. Consequently, the hypothesis also permits interactions of synaptic populations that encode different memories within the same neuronal population-hence, it gives rise to the associativity of plasticity. In this review, the recent advances and progress since the experimental debut of the STC hypothesis will be shared. This includes the role of neuromodulation in PRP synthesis and tag integrity, behavioural correlates of the hypothesis and modelling in silico. STC, as a more sensitive assay for synaptic health, can also assess neuronal aberrations. We will also expound how synaptic plasticity and associativity are altered in ageing-related decline and pathological conditions such as juvenile stress, cancer, sleep deprivation and Alzheimer's disease. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Long-term potentiation: 50 years on'.

Keywords: Synaptic Tagging; hippocampus; long-term depression; long-term potentiation; memory; synaptic plasticity; synaptic tagging and capture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Timeline depicting key studies in understanding fundamental properties of STC.
Figure 1.
Timeline depicting key studies in understanding fundamental properties of STC [2,3] and how STC has been used in different ways to inform on synaptic plasticity processes. These include investigations on the plasticity-related product (PRP) synthesis, compartmentalization [4,5] and regions beyond the CA1 [–9]. Key behavioural [10,11] and computational [12,13] findings are also highlighted. ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; LTD, long-term depression; LTP, long-term potentiation.
Persistence and associativity of plasticity require STC mechanisms.
Figure 2.
Persistence and associativity of plasticity require STC mechanisms. (a) Weak stimulus, that is weak tetanization (WTET), induces tag setting but not activation of signalling pathways towards PRP synthesis. Thus, the tetanized synapse loses its transient tag and does not exhibit long-lasting potentiation. (b) Strong stimulus (STET) is delivered onto a synapse. This will trigger tag setting and PRP synthesis through signalling cascades (green non-continuous line). PRPs are made available in the neuron and are captured by the tag present in the tetanized synapse. As such, the synapse maintains an input-specific long-lasting LTP. (c) Weak and strong stimuli in temporal proximity (WTET of a synapse occurs in temporal proximity of STET of another synapse). STET induction leads to PRP synthesis. These PRPs are then captured by both tags set by the WTET- and STET-activated synapses. Thus, both synapses exhibit long-lasting potentiation. This is a graphical representation of how associativity of synapses is achieved through STC.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morris RG, Davis S, Butcher SP. 1990. Hippocampal synaptic plasticity and NMDA receptors: a role in information storage? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 329 , 187–204. (10.1098/rstb.1990.0164) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frey U, Morris RG. 1997. Synaptic tagging and long-term potentiation. Nature 385 , 533–536. (10.1038/385533a0) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shires KL, Da Silva BM, Hawthorne JP, Morris RGM, Martin SJ. 2012. Synaptic tagging and capture in the living rat. Nat. Commun. 3 , 1246. (10.1038/ncomms2250) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sajikumar S, Korte M. 2011. Metaplasticity governs compartmentalization of synaptic tagging and capture through brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and protein kinase Mζ (PKMζ). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 , 2551–2556. (10.1073/pnas.1016849108) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alarcon JM, Barco A, Kandel ER. 2006. Capture of the late phase of long-term potentiation within and across the apical and basilar dendritic compartments of CA1 pyramidal neurons: synaptic tagging is compartment restricted. J. Neurosci. 26 , 256–264. (10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3196-05.2006) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources