Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 May 31:2024.05.30.24308244.
doi: 10.1101/2024.05.30.24308244.

Degree of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition Modulates Blood Pressure Response to Celecoxib and Naproxen

Affiliations

Degree of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition Modulates Blood Pressure Response to Celecoxib and Naproxen

Katherine N Theken et al. medRxiv. .

Abstract

Background: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events via suppression of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-derived prostacyclin (PGI2) formation in heart, vasculature, and kidney. The Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Celecoxib Integrated Safety versus Ibuprofen Or Naproxen (PRECISION) trial and other large clinical studies compared the cardiovascular risk of traditional NSAIDs (i.e. naproxen), which inhibit both COX isozymes, with NSAIDs selective for COX-2 (i.e. celecoxib). However, whether pharmacologically equipotent doses were used - that is, whether a similar degree of COX-2 inhibition was achieved - was not considered. We compared drug target inhibition and blood pressure response to celecoxib at the dose used by most patients in PRECISION with the lowest recommended naproxen dose for osteoarthritis, which is lower than the dose used in PRECISION.

Methods: Sixteen healthy participants (19-61 years) were treated with celecoxib (100 mg every 12h), naproxen (250 mg every 12h), or placebo administered twice daily for seven days in a double-blind, crossover design randomized by order. On Day 7 when drug levels had reached steady state, the degree of COX inhibition was assessed ex vivo and in vivo. Ambulatory blood pressure was measured throughout the final 12h dosing interval.

Results: Both NSAIDs inhibited COX-2 activity relative to placebo, but naproxen inhibited COX-2 activity to a greater degree (62.9±21.7%) than celecoxib (35.7±25.2%; p<0.05). Similarly, naproxen treatment inhibited PGI2 formation in vivo (48.0±24.9%) to a greater degree than celecoxib (26.7±24.6%; p<0.05). Naproxen significantly increased blood pressure compared to celecoxib (differences in least-square means of mean arterial pressure: 2.5 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.5, 3.5); systolic blood pressure: 4.0 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.9, 5.1); diastolic blood pressure: 1.8 mm Hg (95% CI: 0.8, 2.8); p<0.05 for all). The difference in systolic blood pressure relative to placebo was associated with the degree of COX-2 inhibition (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Celecoxib 200 mg/day inhibited COX-2 activity to a lesser degree than naproxen 500 mg/day, resulting in a less pronounced blood pressure increase. While the PRECISION trial concluded the non-inferiority of celecoxib regarding cardiovascular risk, this is based on a comparison of doses that are not equipotent.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02502006 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02502006).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Comparison of (A) COX-1 inhibition ex vivo and (B) in vivo and (C) COX-2 inhibition ex vivo and (D) in vivo by treatment. Plasma concentrations of (E) celecoxib and (F) naproxen over time. Dosing occurred at 8:00 AM ± 15 min. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. *p<0.05
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Comparison of (A) SBP, (B) DBP, and (C) MAP over 12-hour dosing interval by treatment. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. (D) Change in SBP relative to placebo with celecoxib and naproxen treatment. Dosing occurred at 8:00 AM ± 15 min. *p<0.05
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Relationship between degree of COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition ex vivo and change in systolic blood pressure.

References

    1. In: Phillips JK, Ford MA, Bonnie RJ, eds. Pain Management and the Opioid Epidemic: Balancing Societal and Individual Benefits and Risks of Prescription Opioid Use. Washington (DC); 2017. - PubMed
    1. Grosser T, Woolf CJ, FitzGerald GA. Time for nonaddictive relief of pain. Science. 2017;355:1026–1027. doi: 10.1126/science.aan0088 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stagnitti MN. Trends in Outpatient Prescription Analgesics Utilization and Expenditures for the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population, 1996 and 2006. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. https://meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st235/stat235.shtml. 2009.Accessed 1/5/2024.
    1. Zhou Y, Boudreau DM, Freedman AN. Trends in the use of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the general U.S. population. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2014;23:43–50. doi: 10.1002/pds.3463 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gorski T, Cadore EL, Pinto SS, da Silva EM, Correa CS, Beltrami FG, Kruel LF. Use of NSAIDs in triathletes: prevalence, level of awareness and reasons for use. British journal of sports medicine. 2011;45:85–90. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.062166 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data