Influence of interruption of oral mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis on outcomes after single cord blood transplantation
- PMID: 38854401
- PMCID: PMC11153209
- DOI: 10.31547/bct-2023-038
Influence of interruption of oral mycophenolate mofetil for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis on outcomes after single cord blood transplantation
Abstract
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, is used as the prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Compared to intravenous methotrexate (MTX), MMF is associated with a lower incidence of mucositis and shorter time for hematopoietic engraftment but comparable incidence of acute GVHD, resulting in the preferred use of MMF for GVHD prophylaxis in elderly patients or those undergoing cord blood transplantation (CBT). Although several studies have evaluated the clinical impact of MTX omission due to toxicity after allogeneic HCT, the impact of oral MMF interruption for GVHD prophylaxis on transplant outcomes remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively analyzed the consecutive data of adult patients who underwent single-unit unrelated CBT and received oral MMF in combination with cyclosporine for GVHD prophylaxis at our hospital. Among the 53 patients, the planned dose of MMF was interrupted in 14 with a median of 19.5 d (range, 3-27 d) of CBT. In multivariate analysis, MMF interruption, which was treated as a time-dependent covariate, was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 5.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-14.43; P < 0.001) and higher non-relapse mortality (HR, 7.56; 95% CI, 1.99-28.79; P = 0.002). Further studies with larger cohorts are necessary to confirm the clinical significance of oral MMF interruption in GVHD prophylaxis.
Keywords: allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation; cord blood transplantation; graft-versus-host disease; interruption; mycophenolate mofetil.
Copyright Ⓒ2024 Asia-Pacific Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group (APBMT).
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest. Disclosure form provided by the author are available on the website. Satoshi Takahashi is one of the Editors of Blood Cell Therapy. He was not involved in the editorial evaluation or decision to accept this article for publication.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Comparative Analysis of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil-Containing Regimens for Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease after Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Transplantation.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jan;25(1):73-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 25. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019. PMID: 30153491 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Inferior Outcomes with Cyclosporine and Mycophenolate Mofetil after Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Sep;25(9):1744-1755. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 May 31. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019. PMID: 31158502 Free PMC article.
-
Methotrexate Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Chronic Myeloid Malignancies: A Retrospective Analysis on Behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.Am J Hematol. 2025 Jan;100(1):38-51. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27531. Epub 2024 Nov 28. Am J Hematol. 2025. PMID: 39605194
-
Comparing the risk of severe oral mucositis associated with methotrexate as graft-versus host-disease prophylaxis to other immunosuppressive prophylactic agents in hematopoietic cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Support Care Cancer. 2024 Jul 17;32(8):519. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08722-w. Support Care Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39017899 Free PMC article.
-
Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.2024 Apr 11. In: Sureda A, Corbacioglu S, Greco R, Kröger N, Carreras E, editors. The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies [Internet]. 8th edition. Cham (CH): Springer; 2024. Chapter 44. 2024 Apr 11. In: Sureda A, Corbacioglu S, Greco R, Kröger N, Carreras E, editors. The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies [Internet]. 8th edition. Cham (CH): Springer; 2024. Chapter 44. PMID: 39437088 Free Books & Documents. Review.
References
-
- Ram R, Yeshurun M, Vidal L, Shpilberg O, Gafter-Gvili A. Mycophenolate mofetil vs. methotrexate for the prevention of graft-versus-host-disease--systematic review and meta-analysis. Leuk Res. 2014; 38: 352-60. - PubMed
-
- Kharfan-Dabaja M, Mhaskar R, Reljic T, Pidala J, Perkins JB, Djulbegovic B, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil versus methotrexate for prevention of graft-versus-host disease in people receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 7: CD010280. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bolwell B, Sobecks R, Pohlman B, Andresen S, Rybicki L, Kuczkowski E, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing cyclosporine and short course methotrexate with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis in myeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004; 34: 621-5. - PubMed
-
- Iida M, Fukuda T, Ikegame K, Yoshihara S, Ogawa H, Taniguchi S, et al. Use of mycophenolate mofetil in patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Japan. Int J Hematol. 2011; 93: 523-31. - PubMed
-
- Iida M, Fukuda T, Uchida N, Murata M, Aotsuka N, Minagawa K, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil use after unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for prophylaxis and treatment of graft-vs.-host disease in adult patients in Japan. Clin Transplant. 2014; 28: 980-9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources