Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 22;9(22):23822-23831.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c10339. eCollection 2024 Jun 4.

ROP Prediction Method Based on PCA-Informer Modeling

Affiliations

ROP Prediction Method Based on PCA-Informer Modeling

Yefeng Wang et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

Increasing the rate of penetration (ROP) is an effective means to improve the drilling efficiency. At present, the efficiency and accuracy of intelligent prediction methods for the rate of penetration still need to be improved. To improve the efficiency and accuracy of rate of penetration prediction, this paper proposes a ROP prediction model based on Informer optimized by principal component analysis (PCA). We take the Taipei Basin block oilfield as an example. First, we use principal component analysis to extract data features, transforming the original data into low-dimensional feature data. Second, we use the PCA-optimized data to build an Informer model for predicting ROP. Finally, combined with actual data and using the recurrent neural network (RNN) and long short-term memory (LSTM) as baselines, we perform algorithm performance comparative analysis using root-mean-square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R 2). The results show that the average MAE, RMSE, and R 2 of the PCA-Informer model are 9.402, 0.172, and 0.858, respectively. Compared with other methods, it has a larger R 2 and smaller RMSE and MAPE, indicating that this method significantly outperforms existing methods and provides a new solution to improve the rate of penetration in actual drilling operations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Forecasting workflow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Raw collection data.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Informer model structure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Informer’s encoder.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Accuracy of the model on the training set before and after PCA optimization.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Prediction results of all methods on the test set.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Distribution of predicted values for the models.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Parameter Sensitivity of Components in Informer.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Total runtime in the training/testing stage.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hegde C.; Daigle H.; Gray K. E. Performance comparison of algorithms for real-time rate-of-penetration optimization in drilling using data-driven models. SPE J. 2018, 23, 1706–1722. 10.2118/191141-PA. - DOI
    1. Oyedere M.; Gray K. ROP and TOB optimization using machine learning classification algorithms. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2020, 77, 10323010.1016/j.jngse.2020.103230. - DOI
    1. Ashrafi S. B.; Anemangely M.; Sabah M.; Ameri M. J. Application of hybrid artificial neural networks for predicting rate of penetration (ROP): A case study from Marun oil field. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 175, 604–623. 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.12.013. - DOI
    1. Brenjkar E.; Delijani E. B. Computational prediction of the drilling rate of penetration (ROP): A comparison of various machine learning approaches and traditional models. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2022, 210, 11003310.1016/j.petrol.2021.110033. - DOI
    1. Mazen A. Z.; Rahmanian N.; Mujtaba I.; Hassanpour A. Prediction of Penetration Rate for PDC Bits Using Indices of Rock Drillability, Cuttings Removal, and Bit Wear. SPE Drill. Completion 2021, 36, 320–337. 10.2118/204231-PA. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources