Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;14(4):992-1004.
doi: 10.1007/s12671-023-02109-4. Epub 2023 Apr 13.

A Network Investigation of Core Mindfulness Processes

Margaret Sala  1 , Mihaela Aslan  2 , Ralitza Gueorguieva  3 , Madeline Schupak  1 , Kathleen A Garrison  4
Affiliations

A Network Investigation of Core Mindfulness Processes

Margaret Sala et al. Mindfulness (N Y). 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Mindfulness has been associated with improved psychological well-being and health, although outcomes from mindfulness-based interventions are mixed. One challenge is a limited understanding about which specific processes are core to mindfulness. Network analysis offers a method to characterize the core processes of mindfulness.

Methods: This study used network analysis to identify which processes are central to mindfulness (have the strongest connectivity with other mindfulness processes) as measured by the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire- Short Form, analyzed at the item-level. Data were obtained from baseline of a randomized clinical trial of smartphone app-based mindfulness training for smoking cessation.

Results: The most central processes in the mindfulness network included, "I think some of my emotions are bad or inappropriate and I shouldn't feel them," an aspect of Nonjudgment/acceptance; as well as "I can easily put my beliefs, opinions, and expectations into words," and "It's hard for me to find the words to describe what I'm thinking," aspects of Describing.

Conclusions: Findings help to clarify which processes are to mindfulness, contributing to a better understanding of the definition of mindfulness, and suggest factors that may be promising to target in mindfulness-based interventions. Future research should examine if mindfulness-based interventions may be improved by targeting these core mindfulness processes.

Keywords: acceptance; awareness; mindfulness; network analysis; network theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mindfulness network. Thicker lines represent stronger relationships
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Centrality plots. Strength (left) and expected influence (right) values of each node are presented. Centrality indices are shown as standardized z-scores, ordered by highest value.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Network Stability. a) Bootstrapped confidence intervals of estimated edge-weights. The red line indicates the raw values, the black line the bootstrapped values, and the gray area the bootstrapped CIs. Network edges are ordered based on edge-weights, from highest to lowest. The y-axis labels have been removed for clarity. b) Sequential average correlations between centrality indices of random subsets and the original sample. c) Bootstrapped difference tests (α = 0.05) between edge weights that were non-zero in the estimated network
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Network Stability. a) Bootstrapped confidence intervals of estimated edge-weights. The red line indicates the raw values, the black line the bootstrapped values, and the gray area the bootstrapped CIs. Network edges are ordered based on edge-weights, from highest to lowest. The y-axis labels have been removed for clarity. b) Sequential average correlations between centrality indices of random subsets and the original sample. c) Bootstrapped difference tests (α = 0.05) between edge weights that were non-zero in the estimated network
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Network Stability. a) Bootstrapped confidence intervals of estimated edge-weights. The red line indicates the raw values, the black line the bootstrapped values, and the gray area the bootstrapped CIs. Network edges are ordered based on edge-weights, from highest to lowest. The y-axis labels have been removed for clarity. b) Sequential average correlations between centrality indices of random subsets and the original sample. c) Bootstrapped difference tests (α = 0.05) between edge weights that were non-zero in the estimated network
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Bootstrapped strength (left panel) and expected influence (right panel) difference results. Black boxes indicate nodes that differ significantly from one another, and grey boxes represent nodes that do not differ significantly from one another, and white boxes show node strength.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Aizik-Reebs A, Shoham A, Hadash Y, & Bernstein A (2021). A network modeling approach to mindfulness mechanisms: a proof-of-concept investigation. Mindfulness, 12(5), 1115–1126. doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01580-7 - DOI
    1. Aizik-Reebs A, Y. K, Hadash Y, Gebreyohans Gebremariam S, & Bernstein A (2021). Mindfulness-Based Trauma Recovery for Refugees (MBTR-R): Randomized waitlist-control evidence of efficacy and safety. Clinical Psychological Science, 9(6), 1164–1184. doi:10.1177/2167702621998641 - DOI
    1. Baer R (2019). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report. Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 42–48. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baer RA, Smith GT, & Allen KB (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. doi:10.1177/1073191104268029 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, & Toney L (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. doi:10.1177/1073191105283504 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources