Development and Validation of a New Tool for Evaluating Educational Videos Discussing Skin Surgical Procedure Techniques
- PMID: 38854851
- PMCID: PMC11162625
- DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S469592
Development and Validation of a New Tool for Evaluating Educational Videos Discussing Skin Surgical Procedure Techniques
Abstract
Background: The available tools for evaluating scientific content target written scientific evidence and referencing without considering surgical, technical, or video graphic aspects.
Objective: This study developed and validated a tool for qualitatively evaluating videos in the field of skin surgery. This will increase the quality of recorded surgical materials published online and ultimately enhance the reliability of streaming platforms as educational resources.
Methodology: Tool development included several stages: draft generation, expert panel setting, internal reliability testing, and pilot study.
Results: After two rounds of expert panels evaluating the developed tool, 23 relevant items evaluating the educational value, scientific accuracy, and clarity of the surgical technical steps of the videos were obtained. We applied the tool to the top 25 YouTube videos discussing elliptical excision. Internal consistency, reliability, and substantial agreement between the raters were identified. We identified a strong positive correlation between our tool score and the global rating score (r= 0.55, P= 0.004).
Conclusion: It is critical to avoid relying on any video for educational purposes. The tool generated and validated in our study can determine a video's value. A pilot study of 25 YouTube videos demonstrated that the available videos are of fair-good quality, thus necessitating the need for high-quality video production.
Keywords: education; skin surgery; tool validation; video evaluation; youtube videos.
© 2024 Almuqarrab et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Pain Management After Cesarean Birth: Content Analysis.JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Jun 23;3:e40802. doi: 10.2196/40802. JMIR Infodemiology. 2023. PMID: 37351938 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating the quality, utility, and reliability of the information in uveitis videos shared on YouTube.Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02454-8. Epub 2022 Aug 9. Int Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 35945414
-
Evaluation of YouTube laparoscopic hysterectomy videos as educational materials during the COVID-19 era using the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) and LAP-VEGaS video assessment tool.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jul;42(5):1325-1330. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1962823. Epub 2021 Oct 27. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. PMID: 34704513
-
Assessment of YouTube as an educational tool in teaching thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy.J Laryngol Otol. 2022 Oct;136(10):952-960. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121004096. Epub 2021 Dec 13. J Laryngol Otol. 2022. PMID: 34895376
-
YouTube as a Source of Patient and Trainee Education in Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review.EJVES Vasc Forum. 2024 Jan 26;61:62-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.01.054. eCollection 2024. EJVES Vasc Forum. 2024. PMID: 38414727 Free PMC article. Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources