Ten misconceptions regarding decision-making in critical care
- PMID: 38855268
- PMCID: PMC11155500
- DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.89644
Ten misconceptions regarding decision-making in critical care
Abstract
Diagnostic errors are prevalent in critical care practice and are associated with patient harm and costs for providers and the healthcare system. Patient complexity, illness severity, and the urgency in initiating proper treatment all contribute to decision-making errors. Clinician-related factors such as fatigue, cognitive overload, and inexperience further interfere with effective decision-making. Cognitive science has provided insight into the clinical decision-making process that can be used to reduce error. This evidence-based review discusses ten common misconceptions regarding critical care decision-making. By understanding how practitioners make clinical decisions and examining how errors occur, strategies may be developed and implemented to decrease errors in Decision-making and improve patient outcomes.
Keywords: Clinical reasoning; Cognitive bias; Critical care; Debiasing strategies decision making; Diagnostic error; Diagnostic reasoning; Heuristics; Medical knowledge; Patient safety.
©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Teaching Critical Thinking: A Case for Instruction in Cognitive Biases to Reduce Diagnostic Errors and Improve Patient Safety.Acad Med. 2019 Feb;94(2):187-194. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002518. Acad Med. 2019. PMID: 30398993
-
Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing.BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii58-ii64. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001712. Epub 2013 Jul 23. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013. PMID: 23882089 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical decision-making: heuristics and cognitive biases for the ophthalmologist.Surv Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan-Feb;63(1):119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 30. Surv Ophthalmol. 2018. PMID: 28860081 Review.
-
Cognitive Debiasing Strategies: A Faculty Development Workshop for Clinical Teachers in Emergency Medicine.MedEdPORTAL. 2017 Oct 23;13:10646. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10646. MedEdPORTAL. 2017. PMID: 30800847 Free PMC article.
-
Cognitive Bias and Dissonance in Surgical Practice: A Narrative Review.Surg Clin North Am. 2023 Apr;103(2):271-285. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2022.11.003. Surg Clin North Am. 2023. PMID: 36948718 Review.
References
-
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015. - PubMed
-
- Winters B, Custer J, Galvagno SM Jr, Colantuoni E, Kapoor SG, Lee H, Goode V, Robinson K, Nakhasi A, Pronovost P, Newman-Toker D. Diagnostic errors in the intensive care unit: a systematic review of autopsy studies. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:894–902. - PubMed
-
- Newman-Toker DE, Pronovost PJ. Diagnostic errors--the next frontier for patient safety. JAMA. 2009;301:1060–1062. - PubMed
-
- Tejerina EE, Padilla R, Abril E, Frutos-Vivar F, Ballen A, Rodríguez-Barbero JM, Lorente JÁ, Esteban A. Autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time in the intensive care unit. Hum Pathol. 2018;76:85–90. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources