Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 9;13(2):92751.
doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.92751.

Major liver resections, perioperative issues and posthepatectomy liver failure: A comprehensive update for the anesthesiologist

Affiliations
Review

Major liver resections, perioperative issues and posthepatectomy liver failure: A comprehensive update for the anesthesiologist

Andrea De Gasperi et al. World J Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Significant advances in surgical techniques and relevant medium- and long-term outcomes over the past two decades have led to a substantial expansion in the indications for major liver resections. To support these outstanding results and to reduce perioperative complications, anesthesiologists must address and master key perioperative issues (preoperative assessment, proactive intraoperative anesthesia strategies, and implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery approach). Intensive care unit monitoring immediately following liver surgery remains a subject of active and often unresolved debate. Among postoperative complications, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) occurs in different grades of severity (A-C) and frequency (9%-30%), and it is the main cause of 90-d postoperative mortality. PHLF, recently redefined with pragmatic clinical criteria and perioperative scores, can be predicted, prevented, or anticipated. This review highlights: (1) The systemic consequences of surgical manipulations anesthesiologists must respond to or prevent, to positively impact PHLF (a proactive approach); and (2) the maximal intensive treatment of PHLF, including artificial options, mainly based, so far, on Acute Liver Failure treatment(s), to buy time waiting for the recovery of the native liver or, when appropriate and in very selected cases, toward liver transplant. Such a clinical context requires a strong commitment to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and intensivists to work together, for a fruitful collaboration in a mandatory clinical continuum.

Keywords: Artificial liver support; Chronic liver disease; Intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring; Liver resection; Posthepatectomy liver failure; Postoperative intensive care unit; Preoperative assessment; Vascular clamping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Surgical anatomy of the liver and resection lines. Couinaud segmental liver anatomy and the normal portal venous structures biliary tract structures. Resection lines (---) and Hepatic segments (Arabic numbers) resected during major hepatectomies Right, Left and extended) (from Njoku DB, Chitilian HV, Kronish K. Hepatic Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Anesthetic Considerations. In Miller’s Anesthesia Michael A. Gropper, Ronald D Miller, Neal H. Cohen Lars I. Eriksson Kate Leslie, Jeanine P. Wiener-Kronish NINTH EDITION. Elsevier 2020: 420-443[27]; and with permission).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Vascular occlusion techniques in hepatic surgery to reduce hemorrhage during hepatic resection. A: Pringle maneuver to occlude hepatic arterial and portal venous inflow to the liver; B and C: Selective hepatic vascular exclusion involves clamping of the vessels perfusing the hemi-liver which is being resected; D: Total hepatic vascular exclusion, clamping the inferior vena cava above and below the liver along with the hepatoduodenal ligament; E: Variant technique combining clamping of the infrahepatic Inferior vena cava with a clamp across the hepatoduodenal ligament (from Njoku DB, Chitilian HV, Kronish K. Hepatic Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Anesthetic Considerations. In Miller’s Anesthesia Michael A. Gropper, Ronald D Miller, Neal H. Cohen Lars I. Eriksson Kate Leslie, Jeanine P. Wiener-Kronish NINTH EDITION. Elsevier 2020: 420-443[27] ; and with permission).

References

    1. Krige A, Kelliher LJS. Anaesthesia for Hepatic Resection Surgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2022;40:91–105. - PubMed
    1. Koh YX, Zhao Y, Tan IE, Tan HL, Chua DW, Loh WL, Tan EK, Teo JY, Au MKH, Goh BKP. The impact of hospital volume on liver resection: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Surgery. 2024;175:393–403. - PubMed
    1. Sparrelid E, Olthof PB, Dasari BVM, Erdmann JI, Santol J, Starlinger P, Gilg S. Current evidence on posthepatectomy liver failure: comprehensive review. BJS Open. 2022;6 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumgartner R, Engstrand J, Rajala P, Grip J, Ghorbani P, Sparrelid E, Gilg S. Comparing the accuracy of prediction models to detect clinically relevant post-hepatectomy liver failure early after major hepatectomy. Br J Surg. 2024;111 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siriwardena AK, Mason JM, Mullamitha S, Hancock HC, Jegatheeswaran S. Management of colorectal cancer presenting with synchronous liver metastases. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:446–459. - PubMed