Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 29:12:100573.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100573. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Shear wave elastography for solid breast masses evaluation: Quantitative measurement of mean elasticity value and elasticity ratio

Affiliations

Shear wave elastography for solid breast masses evaluation: Quantitative measurement of mean elasticity value and elasticity ratio

N Marukatat et al. Eur J Radiol Open. .

Abstract

Purpose: Shear wave elastography (SWE), an ultrasonographic technique to measure the elasticity of mass lesions to evaluate breast mass. This study aimed to find out the cutoff values identifying breast malignancy using the mean elasticity (E-mean) and elasticity ratio (E-ratio) of breast masses.

Methods: This retrospective study included women underwent SWE and US-guided biopsy of breast masses. During conventional US, the SWE mode was also performed, determining elasticity measurements, E-mean and E-ratio. Histopathological reports were obtained to identify mass status. The optimal and alternative cutoff values for E-mean and E-ratio to determine malignancy were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and Youden's index score.

Results: Among 147 benign and 93 malignant masses, the median of E-means were 26.20 (IQR 15.70-56.60) and 141.60 (IQR 119.80-154.60) kPa and the median E-ratios were 3.11 (IQR 1.83-5.23) and 9.24 (IQR 6.76-12.44), respectively. Using Youden's index, the optimal cutoff values for E-mean and E-ratio were 90.35 and 5.89, with sensitivity of 87.1 % and 82.8 %, specificity of 89.1 % and 83.7 %, positive predictive value (PPV) of 83.5 % and 76.2 %, negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.6 % and 88.5 %, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 8.00 and 5.07, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.14 and 0.21, respectively.

Conclusion: This study revealed that SWE is useful in predicting malignancy. With the optimal cutoff values of E-mean and E-ratio at 90.35 kPa and 5.89, the sensitivity was nearly 90 % with E-mean and slightly over 80 % with E-ratio, respectively. These findings could be used in conjunction with conventional US.

Keywords: Breast mass; Elasticity ratio; Mean elasticity; Shear wave elastography; Ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 1A. Shear wave elastography and grayscale ultrasound image of a 20 mm fibroadenoma. The shear wave image shows the lesion in homogeneous blue, defined the most stiffness site as inside tumor. The E-mean and E-ratio are 21.2 kPa and 3.55. Fig. 1B. A 7 mm invasive ductal carcinoma with homogeneous blue. The E-mean and E-ratio are 35.9 kPa and 2.25. Fig.1C. A 22 mm invasive ductal carcinoma. The shear wave image shows the mass and surrounding tissue in heterogeneous color and the zone of stiffness is irregular in red, yellow, and green color. The most stiffness site is red and inside tumor. The E-mean and E-ratio are 167.5 kPa and 13.07. Fig. 1D. A 11 mm invasive ductal carcinoma defined the most stiffness site as peritumoral site. The E-mean and E-ratio are 144.1 kPa and 10.32.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC Curve of E-mean and E-ratio to determine malignancy status of breast masses. Cutoff value for average E-mean at 90.35 kPa (A; sensitivity 0.871 and specificity 0.891), while cutoff value for average E-ratio at 5.89 (B; sensitivity 0.828 and specificity 0.837).

Similar articles

References

    1. Mendelson E.B., Böhm-Vélez, M., Berg, W.A., et al., ACR BI-RADS® ultrasound, in: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 2013, 2013.
    1. Youk J.H., Gweon H.M., Son E.J., Han K.H., Kim J.A. Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4. Eur. Radiol. 2013;23(10):2695–2704. - PubMed
    1. Berg W.A., Cosgrove D.O., Doré C.J., Schäfer F.K.W., Svensson W.E., Hooley R.J., et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology. 2012;262(2):435–449. - PubMed
    1. Liu B., Zheng Y., Huang G., Lin M., Shan Q., Lu Y., et al. Breast lesions: quantitative diagnosis using ultrasound shear wave elastography–a systematic review and meta–analysis. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2016;42(4):835–847. - PubMed
    1. Cosgrove D.O., Berg W.A., Doré C.J., Skyba D.M., Henry J.-P., Gay J., et al. Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible. Eur. Radiol. 2012;22(5):1023–1032. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources