Health technology assessment in musculoskeletal radiology: the case study of EOSedge™
- PMID: 38856961
- PMCID: PMC11252187
- DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01832-9
Health technology assessment in musculoskeletal radiology: the case study of EOSedge™
Abstract
Objectives: Health technology assessment (HTA) is a systematic process used to evaluate the properties and effects of healthcare technologies within their intended use context. This paper describes the adoption of HTA process to assess the adoption of the EOSedge™ system in clinical practice.
Methods: The EOSedge™ system is a digital radiography system that delivers whole-body, high-quality 2D/3D biplanar images covering the complete set of musculoskeletal and orthopedic exams. Full HTA model was chosen using the EUnetHTA Core Model® version 3.0. The HTA Core Model organizes the information into nine domains. Information was researched and obtained by consulting the manufacturers' user manuals, scientific literature, and institutional sites for regulatory aspects.
Results: All nine domains of the EUnetHTA Core Model® helped conduct the HTA of the EOSedge, including (1) description and technical characteristics of the technology; (2) health problem and current clinical practice; (3) safety; (4) clinical effectiveness; (5) organizational aspects; (6) economic evaluation; (7) impact on the patient; (8) ethical aspects; and (9) legal aspects.
Conclusions: EOS technologies may be a viable alternative to conventional radiographs. EOSedge has the same intended use and similar indications for use, technological characteristics, and operation principles as the EOS System and provides significant dose reduction factors for whole spine imaging compared to the EOS System without compromising image quality. Regarding the impact of EOS imaging on patient outcomes, most studies aim to establish technical ability without evaluating their ability to improve patient outcomes; thus, more studies on this aspect are warranted.
Keywords: EOS system; EOSedge; HTA (health technology assessment); Musculoskeletal; Radiography.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Similar articles
-
Performance of automatic exposure control on dose and image quality: comparison between slot-scanning and flat-panel digital radiography systems.Med Phys. 2023 Feb;50(2):1162-1184. doi: 10.1002/mp.15954. Epub 2022 Sep 19. Med Phys. 2023. PMID: 36069636
-
Application of health technology assessment: a new need for an ethical neonatology.Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Oct;183(10):4179-4184. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05620-5. Epub 2024 Aug 13. Eur J Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 39136757 Review.
-
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015. PMID: 26354131 Review.
-
EOSedge vs. standard digital radiography: image quality and dose exposure in hip-focused scanning.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Aug;144(8):3841-3849. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05478-0. Epub 2024 Aug 17. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 39153100
-
[Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Sep-Oct;36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. Epidemiol Prev. 2012. PMID: 23139174 Italian.
Cited by
-
Feasibility of generating sagittal radiographs from coronal views using GAN-based deep learning framework in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Eur Radiol Exp. 2025 Jan 29;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41747-025-00553-6. Eur Radiol Exp. 2025. PMID: 39881022 Free PMC article.
-
What's new in pediatric musculoskeletal imaging.J Child Orthop. 2025 Mar 12;19(2):109-118. doi: 10.1177/18632521251325122. eCollection 2025 Apr. J Child Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40093030 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Tomaiuolo R, Restelli U, Faggiano FC, Di Resta C, Al Bitar Nehme S, Giuliani F, Derrico P, Ricciardi W, Banfi G, Ritrovato M. Health technology assessment to employ COVID-19 serological tests as companion diagnostics in the vaccination campaign against SARS-CoV-2. CCLM. 2022;60:1463–1477. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0262. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ferrante di Ruffano L, Harris IM, Zhelev Z, Davenport C, Mallett S, Peters J, Takwoingi Y, Deeks J, Hyde C. Health technology assessment of diagnostic tests: a state of the art review of methods guidance from international organizations. IJTAHC. 2023;39:e14. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000065. - DOI - PMC - PubMed