Lung Cancer Screening in the US, 2022
- PMID: 38856988
- PMCID: PMC11165414
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1655
Lung Cancer Screening in the US, 2022
Abstract
Importance: The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography in high-risk individuals (age 50-80 years, ≥20 pack-years currently smoking or formerly smoked, and quit <15 years ago) for early detection of LC. However, representative state-level LCS data are unavailable nationwide.
Objective: To estimate the contemporary prevalence of up-to-date (UTD) LCS in the US nationwide and across the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) population-based, nationwide, state-representative survey for respondents aged 50 to 79 years who were eligible for LCS according to the 2021 USPSTF eligibility criteria. Data analysis was performed from October 1, 2023, to March 20, 2024.
Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was self-reported UTD-LCS (defined as past-year) prevalence according to the 2021 USPSTF eligibility criteria in respondents aged 50 to 79 years. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) and 95% CIs compared differences.
Results: Among 25 958 sample respondents eligible for LCS (median [IQR] age, 62 [11] years), 61.5% reported currently smoking, 54.4% were male, 64.4% were aged 60 years or older, and 53.0% had a high school education or less. The UTD-LCS prevalence was 18.1% overall, but varied across states (range, 9.7%-31.0%), with relatively lower levels in southern states characterized by high LC mortality burden. The UTD-LCS prevalence increased with age (50-54 years: 6.7%; 70-79 years: 27.1%) and number of comorbidities (≥3: 24.6%; none: 8.7%). A total of 3.7% of those without insurance and 5.1% of those without a usual source of care were UTD with LCS, but state-level Medicaid expansions (APR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.30-5.53) and higher screening capacity levels (high vs low: APR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.36-2.75) were associated with higher UTD-LCS prevalence.
Conclusions and relevance: This study of data from the 2022 BRFSS found that the overall prevalence of UTD-LCS was low. Disparities were largest according to health care access and geographically across US states, with low prevalence in southern states with high LC burden. The findings suggest that state-based initiatives to expand access to health care and screening facilities may be associated with improved LCS rates and reduced disparities.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Comment on
-
Progress in Lung Cancer Screening Adoption.JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Aug 1;184(8):902-903. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1673. JAMA Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 38857025 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Uptake Appropriateness of Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening According to Patients Meeting Eligibility Criteria of the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2243163. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43163. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 36409492 Free PMC article.
-
Lung cancer screening use and implications of varying eligibility criteria by race and ethnicity: 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data.Cancer. 2022 May 1;128(9):1812-1819. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34098. Epub 2022 Feb 24. Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35201610 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for lung cancer: 2023 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):50-81. doi: 10.3322/caac.21811. Epub 2023 Nov 1. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024. PMID: 37909877
-
Predictors of Up-To-Date Lung Cancer Screening Among Eligible People in the United States: A Nationally Representative Dataset.Clin Lung Cancer. 2025 Jun;26(4):271-278. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2025.03.005. Epub 2025 Mar 17. Clin Lung Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40221330 Review.
-
The 10 Pillars of Lung Cancer Screening: Rationale and Logistics of a Lung Cancer Screening Program.Radiographics. 2015 Nov-Dec;35(7):1893-908. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015150079. Epub 2015 Oct 23. Radiographics. 2015. PMID: 26495797 Review.
Cited by
-
Racism, discrimination, medical mistrust, stigma, and lung cancer screening: a scoping review.Ethn Health. 2025 Apr;30(3):372-397. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2025.2458303. Epub 2025 Feb 3. Ethn Health. 2025. PMID: 39901346
-
Innovative Approaches to Early Detection of Cancer-Transforming Screening for Breast, Lung, and Hard-to-Screen Cancers.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 2;17(11):1867. doi: 10.3390/cancers17111867. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40507348 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility, Uptake, and Adherence in Puerto Rico, 2022.JTO Clin Res Rep. 2025 May 26;6(8):100852. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100852. eCollection 2025 Aug. JTO Clin Res Rep. 2025. PMID: 40612588 Free PMC article.
-
Lung Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: Contribution of the 2020 NHIS Estimates to National and State-Level Trends.Am J Prev Med. 2025 Jul;69(1):107626. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.03.006. Epub 2025 Mar 27. Am J Prev Med. 2025. PMID: 40157465
-
IMPLEMENTING HOME-BASED CANCER PREVENTION AND SCREENING: AN OPPORTUNITY FOR EQUITY.Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2025;135:157-168. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2025. PMID: 40771636 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous