Development of a novel rapid response event review process for quality improvement
- PMID: 38858076
- PMCID: PMC11168121
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002664
Development of a novel rapid response event review process for quality improvement
Abstract
Introduction: Rapid response team (RRT) and code activation events occur relatively commonly in inpatient settings. RRT systems have been the subject of a significant amount of analysis, although this has been largely focused on the impact of RRT system implementation and RRT events on patient outcomes. There is reason to believe that the structured assessment of RRT and code events may be an effective way to identify opportunities for system improvement, although no standardised approach to event analysis is widely accepted. We developed and refined a protocolised system of RRT and code event review, focused on sustainable, timely and high value event analysis meant to inform ongoing improvement activities.
Methods: A group of clinicians with expertise in process and quality improvement created a protocolised analytic plan for rapid response event review, piloted and then iteratively optimised a systematic process which was applied to all subsequent cases to be reviewed.
Results: Hospitalist reviewers were recruited and trained in a methodical approach. Each reviewer performed a chart review to summarise RRT events, and collect specific variables for each case (coding). Coding was then reviewed for concordance, at monthly interdisciplinary group meetings and 'Action Items' were identified and considered for implementation. In any 12-month period starting in 2021, approximately 12-15 distinct cases per month were reviewed and coded, offering ample opportunities to identify trends and patterns.
Conclusion: We have developed an innovative process for ongoing review of RRT-Code events. The review process is easy to implement and has allowed for the timely identification of high value improvement opportunities.
Keywords: electronic health records; healthcare quality improvement; hospital medicine; patient safety; quality improvement methodologies.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Rapid response team activations within 24 hours of admission from the emergency department: an innovative approach for performance improvement.Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;21(6):667-72. doi: 10.1111/acem.12394. Acad Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 25039551
-
Benchmarking the use of a rapid response team by surgical services at a tertiary care hospital.J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jan;218(1):66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Nov 23. J Am Coll Surg. 2014. PMID: 24275072 Free PMC article.
-
Expanding the scope of Critical Care Rapid Response Teams: a feasible approach to identify adverse events. A prospective observational cohort.BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):764-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003833. Epub 2015 Jun 8. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015. PMID: 26056320
-
Rapid response teams in adult hospitals: time for another look?Intern Med J. 2015 Dec;45(12):1211-20. doi: 10.1111/imj.12845. Intern Med J. 2015. PMID: 26122775 Review.
-
Rapid response teams: A review of data collection practice in Victoria, Australia.Aust Crit Care. 2023 Mar;36(2):269-273. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2021.12.001. Epub 2022 Jan 17. Aust Crit Care. 2023. PMID: 35058119 Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources