Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 10;14(6):e076763.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076763.

ERAS for Ambulatory TURBT: Enhancing Bladder Cancer Care (EMBRACE) randomised controlled trial protocol

Affiliations

ERAS for Ambulatory TURBT: Enhancing Bladder Cancer Care (EMBRACE) randomised controlled trial protocol

Michael E Rezaee et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) is one of the more common procedures performed by urologists. It is often described as an 'incision-free' and 'well-tolerated' operation. However, many patients experience distress and discomfort with the procedure. Substantial opportunity exists to improve the TURBT experience. An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol designed by patients with bladder cancer and their providers has been developed.

Methods and analysis: This is a single-centre, randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of an ERAS protocol compared with usual care in patients with bladder cancer undergoing ambulatory TURBT. The ERAS protocol is composed of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative components designed to optimise each phase of perioperative care. 100 patients with suspected or known bladder cancer aged ≥18 years undergoing initial or repeat ambulatory TURBT will be enrolled. The change in Quality of Recovery 15 score, a measure of the quality of recovery, between the day of surgery and postoperative day 1 will be compared between the ERAS and control groups.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial has been approved by the Johns Hopkins Institutional Review Board #00392063. Participants will provide informed consent to participate before taking part in the study. Results will be reported in a separate publication.

Trial registration number: NCT05905276.

Keywords: Adult oncology; Bladder disorders; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; UROLOGY; Urological tumours.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart. DOS, day of surgery; ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; MME, morphine milligram equivalent; POD, postoperative day; UTI-SIQ-8, Urinary Tract Infection-Symptom and Impairment Questionnaire; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–49. 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burger M, Catto JWF, Dalbagni G, et al. . Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2013;63:234–41. 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Musat MG, Kwon CS, Masters E, et al. . Treatment outcomes of high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) in real-world evidence (RWE) studies: systematic literature review (SLR). Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2022;14:35–48. 10.2147/CEOR.S341896 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aldousari S, Kassouf W. Update on the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2010;4:56–64. 10.5489/cuaj.777 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee LJ, Kwon CS, Forsythe A, et al. . Humanistic and economic burden of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: results of two systematic literature reviews. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res 2020;12:693–709. 10.2147/CEOR.S274951 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data