Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;48(14):2625-2633.
doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04137-4. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

Hybrid Chin Advancement: Combining Fat and Sliced Cartilage Grafts for Chin Augmentation During Rhinoplasty

Affiliations

Hybrid Chin Advancement: Combining Fat and Sliced Cartilage Grafts for Chin Augmentation During Rhinoplasty

Engin Selamioğlu et al. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Facial balance significantly impacts aesthetics, particularly in the middle and lower thirds. Patients with chin retrusion often benefit from sagittal plane chin advancement in rhinoplasty, enhancing surgical outcomes and satisfaction.

Objectives: This article presents a method for analyzing chin deformities and discusses a hybrid treatment approach to harmonize facial features, complementing rhinoplasty.

Methods: The chin positions of patients treated by the senior author were assessed. A retrospective analysis included 49 patients with chin retrusion of 2.5-6 mm. Among them, 22 patients initially offered chin implants declined, leading to planned chin augmentation. Fat grafting was exclusively performed for 20 patients lacking sufficient cartilage. The "Hybrid Chin Advancement" technique involved supporting tissues beneath muscles with nasal septum cartilage and fat injections and tissues above muscles with fat injection alone.

Results: Pre- and postoperative Legan angle measurements and chin advancements were compared across three groups. While preoperative Legan angles were statistically similar, postoperative Legan angles and advancement changes were significantly higher in the implant group (p < 0.0001). Comparing hybrid chin advancement and fat grafting groups, postoperative Legan angles and advancement changes were significantly higher in the hybrid chin group (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Fat grafting suffices for mild advancements (~ 2 mm), while the hybrid chin method is effective for moderate advancements (~ 4 mm). For advancements exceeding 6 mm, implants or osseous genioplasty are optimal. Our study's hybrid approach offers an easy, safe, and reliable method for achieving facial harmony in the lower two-thirds without compromising patient expectations.

Level of evidence iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Keywords: Cartilage graft; Chin augmentation; Fat grafting; Rhinoplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematization of pogonion, menton, and gnathion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Measurement of Legan angle. G: glabella, Sn: subnasal, P: pogonion
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Conception of hybrid chin advancement
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Legan angle before hybrid chin advancement, b decreased Legan angle after hybrid chin advancement
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Anterior view of patient by VECTRA® a preoperative, b postoperative
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Basal view of patient by VECTRA® a preoperative, b postoperative
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Left lateral view of patient by VECTRA® a preoperative, b postoperative
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Left oblique view of patient by VECTRA® a preoperative, b postoperative
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
The red ring indicates increased chin projection after hybrid chin advancement
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Views of patient with hybrid chin advancement, postoperative 1. Year follow-up a preoperative/anterior view, b postoperative/anterior view, c preoperative/lateral view/right side, d postoperative/lateral view/right side, e preoperative/lateral view/left side, f postoperative/lateral view/left side
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Views of patient with hybrid chin advancement, postoperative 1. Year follow-up a preoperative/anterior view, b postoperative/anterior view, c preoperative/lateral view/left side, d postoperative/lateral view/left side, e preoperative/lateral view/right side, f postoperative/lateral view/right side

Similar articles

References

    1. Paul MA, Kamali P, Chen AD, Ibrahim AMS, Wu W, Becherer BE, Medin C, Lin SJ (2018) Assessment of functional rhinoplasty with spreader grafting using acoustic rhinomanometry and validated outcome measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 6(3):e1615. 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001615 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001615 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cingi C, Songu M, Thomas JR (2010) Augmentation mentoplasty with osteocartilaginous nasal graft. Otolaryngol Head and Neck Surg 143(4):549–553. 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.06.913 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.06.913 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuçuker I, Aksakal IA, Yosma E et al (2016) Assessing the expectations of patients demanding rhinoplasty on profile photographs using proportional measurements and simulation programs. Turk J Plast Surg. 10.5152/TurkJPlastSurg.2016.194010.5152/TurkJPlastSurg.2016.1940 - DOI
    1. Sykes JM, Fitzgerald R (2016) Choosing the best procedure to augment the chin: Is anything better than an implant? Facial Plast Surg 32(5):507–512. 10.1055/s-0036-1592162. (Epub 2016 Sep 28) 10.1055/s-0036-1592162 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Szachowicz E II, Kridel RW (1987) Adjunctive measures to rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 20(4):895–912 10.1016/S0030-6665(20)31600-5 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources