Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer following initial omission of biopsy in multiparametric MRI era
- PMID: 38858446
- DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00853-9
Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer following initial omission of biopsy in multiparametric MRI era
Abstract
Background: Multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) is being increasingly adopted for work-up of prostate cancer. For patients selected to omit biopsy, we identified factors associated with repeat MRI, eventual prostate biopsy, and subsequent detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, Grade Group ≥2).
Methods: We identified biopsy-naïve men presenting with PSA 2-20 ng/mL (March 2018-June 2021) undergoing initial mpMRI with PIRADS 1-3 lesions who were not selected for biopsy with ≥6 months follow-up. We examined factors associated with repeat mpMRI, progression to biopsy, and subsequent detection of csPCa with univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
Results: Of 1494 men, 31% (463/1494) did not pursue biopsy. PSA density (PSAD) ≤ 0.1, prostate health index (PHI) < 55, and PIRADS 1-2 were associated with omission of prostate biopsy. csPCa diagnosis-free survival was 97.6% (326/334) with median follow up of 23.1 months (IQR 15.1-34.6 months). Black race, PSA, PHI, PSA density, and PSA and PHI velocity were significant predictors of undergoing repeat mpMRI (15.6%, 52/334) and subsequent biopsy (8.4%, 28/334). 8 men were subsequently diagnosed with csPCa (N = 7 on prostate biopsy; N = 1 incidentally on holmium enucleation of prostate). All patients diagnosed with csPCa had PIRADS 4-5 on repeat mpMRI.
Conclusions: The subsequent detection rate of csPCa among patients not initially biopsied after mpMRI was low at 2.4%. Decisions to omit biopsy after initial reassuring PHI, PSAD, and mpMRI appear safe with subsequent reassuring serum biomarkers and for cause mpMRI during follow-up.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: AER is engaged in consulting with American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Astellas, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Janssen Biotech, Lantheus Medical Imaging, Myovant Sciences, NCCN, Pfizer, Tempus Health, and Veracyte. EMS is engaged in consulting with Astellas, Lantheus Medical Imaging, Pfizer. • The other contributing authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was reviewed under IRB STU00211144 issued by Northwestern University. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:12–49. - PubMed
-
- Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389:815–22. - PubMed
-
- Bryce C, Rapp A. Multiparametric MRI for the evaluation of prostate cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2022;105:665–6. - PubMed
-
- Elwenspoek MMC, Sheppard AL, McInnes MDF, Merriel SWD, Rowe EWJ, Bryant RJ, et al. Comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy with systematic biopsy alone for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e198427. - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources