Short and mid-term neonatal outcomes in high-risk infants undergoing FICare: a case control study

Abstract

Background: FICare model has been evaluated mostly on the stable preterm infant.We have scaled the model to two implementation levels(basic/advanced),making it suitable for all high-risk neonates.We report on the short- and mid-term outcomes of infants enrolled in a pilot on FICare implementation at our NICU.

Methods: During 52 months study period,families were invited to join the program if their newborns' admission required neonatal specialized care for at least 3 weeks,and trained according to the program's curricula.Following a rigorous sequential admission order,each case(FICare group:134 < 34 weeks;52 term newborns)was matched by a contemporary control(CC:134 < 34 weeks;52 term newborns)and 2 historical controls born within the 3 years prior to FICare site implementation(HC:268 < 34 weeks;104 term newborns),cared as usual RESULTS: FICare intervention started by the end of first week of postnatal life.Rates of breastfeeding during admission and at discharge,and direct breastfeeding upon discharge were higher in FICare compared to CC and HC.Duration of intermediate care hospitalization(preterm and term cohorts)and total hospital length of stay (term cohorts)were shorter in FICare group.Use of Emergency Services after discharge was also lower in the FICare group CONCLUSIONS: Short and mid-term efficacy of FICare on health outcomes and family empowerment in a broader and highly-vulnerable neonatal population supports its generalization in complex healthcare neonatal services.

Impact statement: Scaling the FICare model to the critically ill, unstable premature and term infant is feasible and safe. The early intervention shows similar benefits in the short- and mid-term infants' outcomes in the whole spectrum of neonatal specialized care.

Fig. 1. Study participants flow chart during the observation periods.

The contemporary (FICare and Control cohorts)(July 2018-October 2022) and the historical cohort (January 2015-April 2018) are represented. The main reason for not offering FICare intervention to the contemporary controls was having exceeded the capacity established by protocol (13).

Fig. 2. Distribution of main neonatal diagnoses among the study participants.

All patients in the three cohorts are represented according to their predominant neonatal condition.