Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 10;22(1):236.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03454-4.

Validation of the Health Assessment Tool (HAT) based on four aging cohorts from the Swedish National study on Aging and Care

Ahmad Abbadi #  1   2 , Emmanouil Kokoroskos #  3   4   5 , Matthew Stamets  3   6 , Davide L Vetrano  3   7 , Nicola Orsini  6 , Sölve Elmståhl  8 , Cecilia Fagerström  9   10 , Anders Wimo  11 , Anders Sköldunger  11 , Johan Sanmartin Berglund  12 , Christina B Olsson  13   14 , Caroline Wachtler  4   14 , Laura Fratiglioni  3   7 , Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga  3   7
Affiliations

Validation of the Health Assessment Tool (HAT) based on four aging cohorts from the Swedish National study on Aging and Care

Ahmad Abbadi et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: As global aging accelerates, routinely assessing the functional status and morbidity burden of older patients becomes paramount. The aim of this study is to assess the validity of the comprehensive clinical and functional Health Assessment Tool (HAT) based on four cohorts of older adults (60 + years) from the Swedish National study on Aging and Care (SNAC) spanning urban, suburban, and rural areas.

Methods: The HAT integrates five health indicators (gait speed, global cognition, number of chronic diseases, and basic and instrumental activities of daily living), providing an individual-level score between 0 and 10. The tool was constructed using nominal response models, first separately for each cohort and then in a harmonized dataset. Outcomes included all-cause mortality over a maximum follow-up of 16 years and unplanned hospital admissions over a maximum of 3 years of follow-up. The predictive capacity was assessed through the area under the curve (AUC) using logistic regressions. For time to death, Cox regressions were performed, and Harrell's C-indices were reported. Results from the four cohorts were pooled using individual participant data meta-analysis and compared with those from the harmonized dataset.

Results: The HAT demonstrated high predictive capacity across all cohorts as well as in the harmonized dataset. In the harmonized dataset, the AUC was 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.87) for 1-year mortality, 0.81 (95% CI 0.80-0.83) for 3-year mortality, 0.80 (95% CI 0.79-0.82) for 5-year mortality, 0.69 (95% CI 0.67-0.70) for 1-year unplanned admissions, and 0.69 (95% CI 0.68-0.70) for 3-year unplanned admissions. The Harrell's C for time-to-death throughout 16 years of follow-up was 0.75 (95% CI 0.74-0.75).

Conclusions: The HAT is a highly predictive, clinically intuitive, and externally valid instrument with potential for better addressing older adults' health needs and optimizing risk stratification at the population level.

Keywords: Aging cohorts; External validation; Frailty; Geriatric health assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Individual and meta-analyzed predictive capacity of the HAT. Section I across all SNAC cohorts, section II across the external validation cohorts
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
HAT-based geriatric charts and risk of 5-year mortality across all SNAC cohorts and in the harmonized dataset
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health. Accessed 24 Jul 2023.
    1. Chi J, Chen F, Zhang J, Niu X, Tao H, Ruan H, et al. Impacts of frailty on health care costs among community-dwelling older adults: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021;94:104344. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104344. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009;374:1196–1208. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puts MTE, Toubasi S, Andrew MK, Ashe MC, Ploeg J, Atkinson E, et al. Interventions to prevent or reduce the level of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review of the literature and international policies. Age Ageing. 2017;46:383–392. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell E, Petermann-Rocha F, Welsh P, Celis-Morales C, Pell JP, Ho FK, et al. The effect of exercise on quality of life and activities of daily life in frail older adults: a systematic review of randomised control trials. Exp Gerontol. 2021;147:111287. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111287. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types