Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 10;25(1):373.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08201-x.

Surgical Handover Core Outcome Measures (SH-CORE): a protocol for the development of a core outcome set for trials in surgical handover

Jessica M Ryan  1   2   3 , Declan Devane  4   5   6 , Anastasija Simiceva  7 , Walter Eppich  8 , Dara O Kavanagh  9   10 , Christine Cullen  11 , Aisling M Hogan  12 , Deborah A McNamara  13   14   15
Affiliations

Surgical Handover Core Outcome Measures (SH-CORE): a protocol for the development of a core outcome set for trials in surgical handover

Jessica M Ryan et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Surgical handover is associated with a significant risk of care failures. Existing research displays methodological deficiencies and little consensus on the outcomes that should be used to evaluate interventions in this area. This paper reports a protocol to develop a core outcome set (COS) to support standardisation, comparability, and evidence synthesis in future studies of surgical handover between doctors.

Methods: This study adheres to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative guidance for COS development, including the COS-Standards for Development (COS-STAD) and Reporting (COS-STAR) recommendations. It has been registered prospectively on the COMET database and will be led by an international steering group that includes surgical healthcare professionals, researchers, and patient and public partners. An initial list of reported outcomes was generated through a systematic review of interventions to improve surgical handover (PROSPERO: CRD42022363198). Findings of a qualitative evidence synthesis of patient and public perspectives on handover will augment this list, followed by a real-time Delphi survey involving all stakeholder groups. Each Delphi participant will then be invited to take part in at least one online consensus meeting to finalise the COS.

Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) Research Ethics Committee (202309015, 7th November 2023). Results will be presented at surgical scientific meetings and submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. A plain English summary will be disseminated through national websites and social media. The authors aim to integrate the COS into the handover curriculum of the Irish national surgical training body and ensure it is shared internationally with other postgraduate surgical training programmes. Collaborators will be encouraged to share the findings with relevant national health service functions and national bodies.

Discussion: This study will represent the first published COS for interventions to improve surgical handover, the first use of a real-time Delphi survey in a surgical context, and will support the generation of better-quality evidence to inform best practice.

Trial registration: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative 2675. http://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/2675 .

Keywords: Consensus method; Core outcome measure; Core outcome set; Delphi survey; Handoff; Handover; Handover methodology; I-PASS; Information transfer; SBAR; Signoff; Signout; Surgical communication; Surgical handover.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

RCSI SIM (relating to authors JMR and AS) is a CAE Healthcare Centre of Excellence and receives unrestricted funding from CAE Healthcare to support its educational and research activities. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cohen MD, Hilligoss PB. The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):493–497. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.033480. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bigham MT, Logsdon TR, Manicone PE, et al. Decreasing handoff-related care failures in children's hospitals. Pediatrics. 2014;134(2):e572–e579. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1844. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horwitz LI, Moin T, Krumholz HM, Wang L, Bradley EH. Consequences of inadequate sign-out for patient care. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(16):1755–1760. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.16.1755. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Committee on Acute Care Surgery, Canadian Association of General Surgeons. Clinical practice guideline: dynamic practice guidelines for emergency general surgery. 2018. Available at: https://cags-accg.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/ACS-Handbook-CPG-Ch-1-Ro.... Accessed 20 Mar 2023.
    1. Abdellatif A, Bagian JP, Barajas ER, et al. Communication during patient hand-overs: patient safety solutions, volume 1, solution 3, May 2007. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33(7):439–442.

Publication types

MeSH terms