Risk perception in long-term evacuees of Futaba town, Fukushima: a cross-sectional study reveals greater concerns outside the prefecture, 12 years after the accident
- PMID: 38859721
- PMCID: PMC11262855
- DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae039
Risk perception in long-term evacuees of Futaba town, Fukushima: a cross-sectional study reveals greater concerns outside the prefecture, 12 years after the accident
Abstract
For over 12 years since the 2011 East Japan Earthquake, the decontamination of radioactive materials is still incomplete. Although evacuation orders had been lifted in ~15% of Futaba town, the site of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, by August 2022, anxiety regarding the effects of nuclear radiation persists among evacuees, and their intention to return (ITR) remains low. As of August 2023, only 90 residents lived there. As the only town with government functions relocated outside Fukushima Prefecture, Futaba has more residents who evacuated outside the prefecture. Although numerous factors affect risk perception and ITR to the place of previous residence, the impact of evacuation destination on risk perception remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of evacuation destination on radiation risk perception. In 2022, a survey was conducted on 404 evacuees aged >18 years. The responses were compared between groups outside and inside Fukushima using the chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Significant relationships were found between the evacuation destination and risk perception of genetic effects in the next generation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-3.20) and of the health effects of radiation (OR = 1.76, 95%CI: 1.10-2.84), which were both higher in those who had evacuated outside Fukushima. These findings stress the importance of evacuation destination choice and information access for evacuees' risk perception. Enhanced education and support efforts are necessary to help evacuees not only in Fukushima but also throughout Japan.
Keywords: Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident; evacuation destination; long-term evacuation; post-disaster recovery; radiation risk perception; risk communication.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Radiation Risk Perception and Interest in Tritiated Water among Returnees to and Evacuees from Tomioka Town within 20 km of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 2;20(3):2690. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032690. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36768061 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological distress after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident: results of a mental health and lifestyle survey through the Fukushima Health Management Survey in FY2011 and FY2012.Fukushima J Med Sci. 2014;60(1):57-67. doi: 10.5387/fms.2014-1. Epub 2014 Jul 15. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 25030715
-
Severe Psychological Distress of Evacuees in Evacuation Zone Caused by the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158821. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27391446 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comprehensive Health Risk Management after the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident.Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016 Apr;28(4):255-262. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 23. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016. PMID: 26817782 Review.
-
[Mental health in evacuees from the 3.11 complex disaster in Japan].Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2014;116(3):219-23. Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2014. PMID: 24783445 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Health risk perceptions of evacuees of Futaba town, Fukushima.J Radiat Res. 2025 Mar 24;66(2):199-201. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraf008. J Radiat Res. 2025. PMID: 40042594 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Residents of the towns in which the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear station is located express more worries about reputational damage than about the discharge of treated water itself.J Radiat Res. 2025 Mar 24;66(2):196-198. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rraf003. J Radiat Res. 2025. PMID: 39955654 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Secretary and Public Relations Section, Futaba Town Office, Mayor’s Activities. 73-4 Chonishi, Nagatsuka, Futaba Town, Futaba District, Fukushima Prefecture. https://www.town.fukushima-futaba.lg.jp/item/5449.htm (29 January 2024, date last accessed). (in Japanese).
-
- Family Registration and Taxation Division, Futaba Town Office. Evacuation Status (as of August 31, 2023). 73-4 Chonishi, Nagatsuka, Futaba Town, Futaba District, Fukushima Prefecture. https://www.town.fukushima-futaba.lg.jp/10592.htm (29 January 2024, date last accessed). (in Japanese).
-
- Jointly Written by Nikkei Inc. One Year after the Return of Residents to Futaba-Machi, Fukushima, 86 People Are Living in the Town, One Step at a Time toward Recovery. Nihon Keizai Shimbun, 1-3-7 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo. https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXZQOUE30DFF0Q3A830C2000000/ (29 January 2024, date last accessed). (in Japanese).
-
- Jozuka E, Yeung J. Fukushima town lifts evacuation order, allowing former residents to return 11 years after nuclear disaster. CNN World; 2:01 AM EDT, Tue August 30, 2022. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/08/30/asia/futaba-fukushima-nuclear-evacuat... (29 January 2024, date last accessed).
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials