Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 26;8(6):igae040.
doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae040. eCollection 2024.

Examining the Social Networks Types and Their Effects on Caregiving Experience of Family Caregivers for Individuals With Dementia: A Mixed-Methods Study

Jun Wang  1 , Weichu Liu  2 , Xuelian Li  1 , Yingzhuo Ma  1 , Qinghua Zhao  1 , Yang Lü  3 , Mingzhao Xiao  1
Affiliations

Examining the Social Networks Types and Their Effects on Caregiving Experience of Family Caregivers for Individuals With Dementia: A Mixed-Methods Study

Jun Wang et al. Innov Aging. .

Abstract

Background and objectives: Social networks are crucial to personal health, particularly among caregivers of individuals with dementia; however, different types of social networks among caregivers of those with dementia and how these differences are associated with caregiver burden and positive appraisal, remain underexamined. This study aims to depict dementia caregivers' social network types, related factors, and impact on caregiving experiences.

Research design and methods: A questionnaire-based survey was conducted with a total of 237 family caregivers of individuals with dementia nested additional semistructured interviews conducted with 14 caregivers in Chongqing, China. A quantitative study was designed to collect data on personal and situational information, social networks, caregiver burden, and positive aspects of caregiving. Qualitative data were collected via semistructured interviews. Latent class analysis and multivariate regression analyses were applied to quantitative data, and inductive content analysis to qualitative data.

Results: The 3 social network types-family-limited (n = 39, 16.46%), family-dominant (n = 99, 41.77%), and diverse network (n = 99, 41.77%)-differed in age and sex of caregivers and individuals with dementia, stage of dementia, and caregiving intensity. Caregivers in family-dominant networks had a lower caregiver burden (β= -0.299, p = .003) and greater positive aspects of caregiving (β= 0.228, p = .021) than those in family-limited networks. Three themes-accessibility, reciprocity, and reliance-emerged as facilitators and barriers when asking for support. Caregivers frequently cited the perception of economic, practical, and emotional support, yet reported a lack of adequate formal support from healthcare providers.

Discussion and implication: Family caregivers of individuals with dementia have different social network types that vary considerably among sociocultural contexts and perceive various types of support from social networks. Solid family networks and diverse social networks are contributors to long-term dementia care.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Caregivers; Nursing; Social network; Social support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual framework of this study.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Three examples of network maps of family caregivers of individuals with dementia.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Integrated findings of qualitative and quantitative data.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Antonucci, T. C., Ajrouch, K. J., & Birditt, K. S. (2014). The convoy model: Explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Gerontologist, 54(1), 82–92. 10.1093/geront/gnt118 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. Journal of Gerontology, 42(5), 519–527. 10.1093/geronj/42.5.519 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergmann, S., Peper, J., & Bieber, A. (2022). The use of formal care for dementia from a professional perspective: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 825. 10.1186/s12913-022-08229-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohn-Schwartz, E., Levinsky, M., & Litwin, H. (2021). Social network type and subsequent cognitive health among older Europeans. International Psychogeriatrics, 33(5), 495–504. 10.1017/S1041610220003439 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dam, A. E., de Vugt, M. E., Klinkenberg, I. P., Verhey, F. R., & van Boxtel, M. P. (2016). A systematic review of social support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: Are they doing what they promise? Maturitas, 85, 117–130. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.12.008 - DOI - PubMed