Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 27:15:1367686.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1367686. eCollection 2024.

Therapeutic effects of vitamin D supplementation on COVID-19 aggravation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations

Therapeutic effects of vitamin D supplementation on COVID-19 aggravation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Yiyuan Yang et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: The therapeutic effects of vitamin D supplementation on Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) aggravation remain controversial and inconclusive. To probe into this contentious issue, we performed the present meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: Literature published up to June 2023 was retrieved from Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. RCTs assessing mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation (MV), length of hospitalization (LOH), and inflammatory markers containing C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, interleukin-6 (IL-6), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were included. 19 RCTs were involved in the analysis and were conducted subgroup analyses on the baseline COVID-19 severity and vitamin D administration.

Results: In the severity subgroup, statistically significant effects in moderate to severe group were observed in ICU admission (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23, 0.80; p = 0.008), MV (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27, 0.72; p = 0.001) and LOH (SMD -0.49, 95% CI -0.92, -0.06; p = 0.027). In the administration subgroup, effects of ICU admission (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16, 0.97; p = 0.044), MV (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.07, 0.46; p = 0.000) and LOH (SMD -0.50, 95% CI -0.96, -0.04; p = 0.034) were more pronounced in patients supplied with multiple-dose vitamin D than single-dose. Although the result of mortality showed no statistically significant effect, it indicated a reduced trend (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.63, 1.12; p > 0.05). The results of inflammatory markers reached no statistical differences.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis revealed that moderate to severe COVID-19 patients supplied with multiple doses of vitamin D were less apt to need ICU admission, mechanical ventilation and have shorter hospital stays.

Keywords: COVID-19; ICU admission; mechanical ventilation; meta-analysis; mortality; vitamin D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA flowchart of search strategy.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Summary of risk of bias.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plots of RCT for the association of vitamin D supplementation and ICU admission in the severity subgroup (A) and administration subgroup (B).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Forest plots of RCT for the association of vitamin D supplementation and mechanical ventilation in the severity subgroup (A) and administration subgroup (B).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Forest plots of RCT for the association of vitamin D supplementation and mortality in the severity subgroup (A) and administration subgroup (B).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Forest plots of RCT for the association of vitamin D supplementation and length of hospitalization in the severity subgroup (A) and administration subgroup (B).
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 7
Forest plots of RCT for the association of vitamin D supplementation and CRP levels in the severity subgroup (A) and administration subgroup (B).
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 8
Forest plot of RCT for the association of vitamin D supplementation and D-dimer levels in the severity subgroup (A) and administration subgroup (B).
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 9
Forest plot of RCT for the association of vitamin D supplementation and IL-6 levels in the severity subgroup (A) and administration subgroup (B).
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 10
Forest plot of RCT for the association of vitamin D supplementation and LDH levels in the severity subgroup.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Annweiler C., Beaudenon M., Gautier J., Gonsard J., Boucher S., Chapelet G., et al. (2022). High-dose versus standard-dose vitamin D supplementation in older adults with COVID-19 (COVIT-TRIAL): a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled superiority trial. PLoS Med. 19 (5), e1003999. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003999 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ben-Eltriki M., Hopefl R., Wright J. M., Deb S. (2022). Association between vitamin D status and risk of developing severe COVID-19 infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J. Am. Nutr. Assoc. 41 (7), 679–689. 10.1080/07315724.2021.1951891 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bilezikian J. P., Bikle D., Hewison M., Lazaretti-Castro M., Formenti A. M., Gupta A., et al. (2020). MECHANISMS in endocrinology: vitamin D and COVID-19. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 183 (5), R133–R147. 10.1530/EJE-20-0665 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Butler-Laporte G., Nakanishi T., Mooser V., Morrison D. R., Abdullah T., Adeleye O., et al. (2021). Vitamin D and COVID-19 susceptibility and severity in the COVID-19 host genetics initiative: a mendelian randomization study. PLoS Med. 18 (6), e1003605. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003605 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cannata-Andía J. B., Díaz-Sottolano A., Fernández P., Palomo-Antequera C., Herrero-Puente P., Mouzo R., et al. (2022). A single-oral bolus of 100,000 IU of cholecalciferol at hospital admission did not improve outcomes in the COVID-19 disease: the COVID-VIT-D—a randomised multicentre international clinical trial. BMC Med. 20 (1), 83. 10.1186/s12916-022-02290-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types