Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 11;58(2):153-169.
doi: 10.2478/raon-2024-0029. eCollection 2024 Jun 1.

Endoscopic management of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after prophylactic colectomy or restorative proctocolectomy - systematic review of the literature

Affiliations

Endoscopic management of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after prophylactic colectomy or restorative proctocolectomy - systematic review of the literature

Aleksandar Gavric et al. Radiol Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) develop early colorectal adenomas and if left untreated, progression to cancer is an inevitable event. Prophylactic surgery does not prevent further development of cancer in the rectal remnant, rectal cuff in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) and even on the ileal mucosa of the pouch body. The aim of this review is to assess long-term rates of cancer and adenoma development in patients with FAP after prophylactic surgery and to summarise current recommendations for endoscopic management and surveillance of these patients.

Materials and methods: A systematic literature search of studies from January 1946 through to June 2023 was conducted using the PRISMA checklist. The electronic database PubMed was searched.

Results: Fifty-four papers involving 5010 patients were reviewed. Cancer rate in the rectal remnant was 8.8-16.7% in the western population and 37% in the eastern population. The cumulative risk of cancer 30 years after surgery was 24%. Mortality due to cancer in the rectal remnant is 1.1-11.1% with a 5-year survival rate of 55%. The adenoma rate after primary IPAA was 9.4-85% with a cumulative risk of 85% 20 years after surgery and a cumulative risk of 12% for advanced adenomas 10 years after surgery. Cumulative risk for adenomas after ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) was 85% after 5 and 100% after 10 years. Adenomas developed more frequently after stapled (33.9-57%) compared to hand-sewn (0-33%) anastomosis. We identified reports of 45 cancers in patients after IPAA of which 30 were in the pouch body and 15 in the rectal cuff or at the anastomosis.

Conclusions: There was a significant incidence of cancer and adenomas in the rectal remnant and ileal pouch of FAP patients during the long-term follow-up. Regular endoscopic surveillance is recommended, not only in IRA patients, but also in pouch patients after proctocolectomy.

Keywords: familial adenomatous polyposis; ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; ileorectal anastomosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Flowchart of the systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) schema.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Surveillance endoscopy in a 48-year old patient with FAP after colectomy with IRA revealed 18 m LST-G (A). After submucosal injection with gelofusine, indigo carmine and adrenaline, piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR) (B) was performed.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Surveillance endoscopy in a 49-year old patient with FAP after proctocolectomy with IPAA revealed 25 mm LST-G mixed type lesion in the rectal cuff. Lesion was spreading from the anastomosis to the dentate line. Patient had undergone surgery five years earlier and did not show up for endoscopy follow-up since then (A). Lesion was removed with pEMR (B).

Similar articles

References

    1. Kinzler KW, Nilbert MC, Su LK, Vogelstein B, Bryan TM, Levy DB. et al. Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science. 1991;253:661–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1651562. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Church J. Familial adenomatous polyposis. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2009;18:585–98. doi: 101016/jsoc200907002. - PubMed
    1. de Campos FGCM, Perez RO, Imperiale AR, Seid VE, Nahas SC, Cecconello I. Evaluating causes of death in familial adenomatous polyposis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:1943–9. doi: 101007/s11605-010-1288-6. - PubMed
    1. Herzig D, Hardiman K, Weiser M, You N, Paquette I, Feingold DL. et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of inherited polyposis syndromes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:881–94. doi: 101097/DCR0000000000000912. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vasen HF, van Duijvendijk P, Buskens E, Bülow C, Björk J, Järvinen HJ. et al. Decision analysis in the surgical treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: A Dutch-Scandinavian collaborative study including 659 patients. Gut. 2001;49:231–5. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.2.231. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources