Comparative efficacy and safety of six angiotensin II receptor blockers in hypertensive patients: a network meta-analysis
- PMID: 38861046
- DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01755-5
Comparative efficacy and safety of six angiotensin II receptor blockers in hypertensive patients: a network meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The antihypertensive effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are well recognized. However, conventional meta-analyses have reported inconsistent results on their efficacy and safety.
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of six ARBs (losartan, valsartan, irbesartan, telmisartan, candesartan, and olmesartan) commonly used to treat hypertension, using a network meta-analysis.
Method: We retrieved randomized controlled trials on hypertension treatment using ARBs from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. The efficacy outcomes included absolute changes in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure. Safety outcomes were assessed by the total number of adverse events (AEs) during treatment. We conducted the network meta-analysis using the 'bugsnet' and 'gemtc' packages in R.
Results: A total of 193 studies were included. Olmesartan had the highest surface under the cumulative ranking in reducing office systolic (91.4%) and diastolic blood pressure (87.2%). Candesartan has the highest ranking in lowering 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (95.4%), while telmisartan reduced 24 h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (83.4%). Olmesartan also ranked highest in safety (70.8%).
Conclusion: Valsartan and losartan were less effective in lowering blood pressure than other drugs, with no significant differences. Olmesartan and telmisartan were associated with fewer AEs than losartan, although the incidence of adverse events was similar between the other blockers. Olmesartan and telmisartan demonstrated the best balance of antihypertensive efficacy and minimal adverse events. More research is needed to confirm whether telmisartan and olmesartan are optimal choices for controlling blood pressure in patients.
Keywords: Angiotensin receptor blockers; Antihypertensive agents; Blood pressure; Network meta-analysis; Olmesartan; Telmisartan.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
Antihypertensive effects of olmesartan compared with other angiotensin receptor blockers: a meta-analysis.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2012 Oct 1;12(5):335-44. doi: 10.1007/BF03261842. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2012. PMID: 22920046 Review.
-
Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 May;23(5):901-914. doi: 10.1111/jch.14227. Epub 2021 Feb 20. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021. PMID: 33609077 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical pharmacokinetics of angiotensin II (AT1) receptor blockers in hypertension.J Hum Hypertens. 2000 Apr;14 Suppl 1:S73-86. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000991. J Hum Hypertens. 2000. PMID: 10854085 Review.
-
Efficacy and Safety Comparative of Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Olmesartan in the Treatment of hypertension: A Meta-analysis of RCTs.Am J Hypertens. 2023 Nov 15;36(12):643-650. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad075. Am J Hypertens. 2023. PMID: 37596996
-
Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) Compared With Olmesartan in Elderly Asian Patients (≥65 Years) With Systolic Hypertension.Am J Hypertens. 2017 Nov 6;30(12):1163-1169. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx111. Am J Hypertens. 2017. PMID: 28992296 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and Safety of Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers for Primary Hypertension: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.Curr Hypertens Rev. 2025;21(2):117-128. doi: 10.2174/0115734021357729250214090452. Curr Hypertens Rev. 2025. PMID: 39995131
-
The application of telmisartan in central nervous system disorders.Pharmacol Rep. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s43440-025-00737-2. Online ahead of print. Pharmacol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40536710 Review.
References
-
- Writing Group of 2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension, Chinese Hypertension League, Chinese Society of Cardiology, et al. Chinese Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension revised 2018. Chin J Cardiovasc Med. 2019;24(01):24–56.
-
- Oparil S, Williams D, Chrysant SG, et al. Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertense (Greenwich). 2001;3(5):283–318. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical