Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;60(4):377-384.
doi: 10.1007/s11262-024-02083-6. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

Detection of four isomers of the human cytomegalovirus genome using nanopore long-read sequencing

Affiliations

Detection of four isomers of the human cytomegalovirus genome using nanopore long-read sequencing

Hideaki Nanamiya et al. Virus Genes. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Human cytomegalovirus has a linear DNA genome with a total length of approximately 235 kb. This large genome is divided into two domains, "Long" and "Short". There are four isomers of the cytomegalovirus genome with different orientations of each domain. To confirm the presence of four types of isomers, it is necessary to identify the sequence of the junction between the domains. However, due to the presence of repeat sequences, it is difficult to determine the junction sequences by next-generation sequencing analysis. To solve this problem, long-read sequencing was performed using the Oxford Nanopore sequencer and the junctions were successfully identified in four isomers in strain Merin and ATCC-2011-3. Nanopore sequencing also revealed the presence of multiple copies of the "a" sequence (a-seq) in the junctions, indicating the diversity of the junction sequences. These results strongly suggest that long-read sequencing using the nanopore sequencer would be beneficial for identifying the complex structure of the cytomegalovirus genome.

Keywords: Human cytomegalovirus; Long-read sequencing; Nanopore sequencer; Structural variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mardis ER (2013) Next-generation sequencing platforms. Annu Rev Anal Chem 6:287–303 - DOI
    1. Hu T, Chitnis N, Monos D, Dinh A (2021) Next-generation sequencing technologies: an overview. Hum Immunol 82(11):801–811 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gibbs SN, Peneva D, Carter GC, Palomares MR, Thakkar S, Hall DW et al (2023) Comprehensive review on the clinical impact of next-generation sequencing tests for the management of advanced cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 7:e2200715 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. John G, Sahajpal NS, Mondal AK, Ananth S, Williams C, Chaubey A et al (2021) Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in COVID-19: a tool for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, monitoring new strains and phylodynamic modeling in molecular epidemiology. Curr Issues Mol Biol 43(2):845–867 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Feuk L, Carson AR, Scherer SW (2006) Structural variation in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet 7:85–97 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources