Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 11;14(6):e080904.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080904.

Using cerebrospinal fluid nanopore sequencing assay to diagnose tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective cohort study in China

Affiliations

Using cerebrospinal fluid nanopore sequencing assay to diagnose tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective cohort study in China

Lihong Zhou et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of nanopore sequencing for the early diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) using cerebrospinal fluid and compared it with acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear, mycobacterial growth indicator tube culture and Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB)/rifampicin (RIF).

Design: Single-centre retrospective study.

Setting: The Tuberculosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Zhejiang Chinese and Western Medicine Integrated Hospital.

Participants: We enrolled 64 adult patients with presumptive TBM admitted to our hospital from August 2021 to August 2023.

Methods: We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of AFB smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF and nanopore sequencing to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy compared with a composite reference standard for TBM.

Results: Among these 64 patients, all tested negative for TBM by AFB smear. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 11.11%, 100%, 100% and 32.2% for culture, 13.33%, 100%, 100% and 2.76% for Xpert MTB/RIF, and 77.78%, 100%, 100% and 65.52% for nanopore sequencing, respectively.

Conclusion: The diagnostic accuracy of the nanopore sequencing test was significantly higher than that of conventional testing methods used to detect TBM.

Keywords: Diagnostic microbiology; Neurology; Tuberculosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram presenting the classification of patients in the present study. AFB, acid-fast bacillus; MTB, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; RIF, rifampicin; TBM, tuberculous meningitis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Venn diagram of positive tests compared with the composite reference standard. MTB, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; RIF, rifampicin.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Méchaï F, Bouchaud O. Tuberculous meningitis: challenges in diagnosis and management. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2019;175:451–7. 10.1016/j.neurol.2019.07.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahlawat S, Chaudhary R, Dangi M, et al. . Advances in tuberculous meningitis diagnosis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2020;20:1229–41. 10.1080/14737159.2020.1858805 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang Y-Y, Xie B. Progress on diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis. Methods Mol Biol 2018;1754:375–86. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7717-8_20 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thwaites GE, Tran TH. Tuberculous meningitis: many questions, too few answers. Lancet Neurol 2005;4:160–70. 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)01013-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stadelman AM, Ssebambulidde K, Buller A, et al. . Cerebrospinal fluid AFB smear in adults with tuberculous meningitis: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2022;135:102230. 10.1016/j.tube.2022.102230 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources