A superior approach? The role of robotic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with super super obesity using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database
- PMID: 38862824
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10955-z
A superior approach? The role of robotic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with super super obesity using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database
Erratum in
-
Correction: A superior approach? The role of robotic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with super super obesity using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database.Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4762. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11000-9. Surg Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38890174 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with BMI ≥ 60 presents technical challenges, that might be overcome by robotic surgery, but its effectiveness has not been rigorously evaluated. We compared the 30-day outcomes of LSG and robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) in patients with BMI < 60 versus ≥ 60 and between LSG and RSG in patients with BMI ≥ 60.
Methods: Patients aged 18-65 years who underwent sleeve gastrectomy were included using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database. We performed a Propensity Score Matching analysis, with 21 preoperative characteristics. We compared 30-day postoperative outcomes for patients with BMI < 60 versus ≥ 60 using either a laparoscopic (Analysis 1) or robotic approach (Analysis 2) and compared LSG versus RSG in patients with BMI ≥ 60 (Analysis 3).
Results: 297,250 patients underwent LSG and 81,008 RSG. Propensity-matched¸ outcomes in analysis 1 (13,503 matched cases), showed that patients with BMI ≥ 60 had higher rates of mortality (0.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.014), staple line leak (0.3% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.035), postoperative bleeding (0.2% vs 0.1%, p = 0.028), readmissions (3.5% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001), and interventions (0.7% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.028) when compared to patients with BMI < 60. In analysis 2 (4350 matched cases), patients with BMI ≥ 60 demonstrated longer operative times, length of stay, and higher rates of unplanned ICU when compared to patients with BMI < 60. In analysis 3 (4370 matched cases), patients who underwent RSG had fewer readmissions (2.9% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.037), staple line leaks (0.1% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.029), and postoperative bleeding (0.1% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.045), compared to LSG. Conversely, a longer operative time (92.74 ± 38.65 vs. 71.69 ± 37.45 min, p < 0.001) was reported.
Conclusion: LSG patients with BMI ≥ 60 have higher rates of complications compared to patients with a BMI < 60. Moreover, some outcomes may be improved with the robotic approach in patients with BMI ≥ 60. These results underscore the importance of considering a robotic approach in this super super obese population.
Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery; Sleeve gastrectomy.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a MBSAQIP analysis.Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):917-922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6387-6. Epub 2018 Aug 20. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 30128823
-
Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Super-obese.J Surg Res. 2020 May;249:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Jan 6. J Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 31918328
-
Do advances in technology translate to improved outcomes? Comparing robotic bariatric surgery outcomes over two-time intervals utilizing the MBSAQIP database.Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):7970-7979. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10208-5. Epub 2023 Jul 13. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37439819
-
Comparing the Efficacy of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3493-3505. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07413-z. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Obes Surg. 2024. PMID: 39042305
-
Robotic vs Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Patients with BMI > 40 kg/m2 (Class ≥ III Obesity): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obes Surg. 2025 Jun;35(6):2333-2341. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07881-x. Epub 2025 Apr 17. Obes Surg. 2025. PMID: 40244363
Cited by
-
Fully Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Complete Gastric Staple Line Bioabsorbable Reinforcement: How I Do It (a Video).Obes Surg. 2025 Jun;35(6):2384-2386. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07880-y. Epub 2025 Apr 23. Obes Surg. 2025. PMID: 40268840
References
-
- World Obesity Foundation (2023) World obesity atlas 2023. https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wof-files/World_Obesity_Atlas_2023_Re...
-
- Arterburn DE, Courcoulas AP (2014) Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic conditions in adults. BMJ 349:g3961. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3961 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Wolfe BM, Kvach E, Eckel RH (2016) Treatment of obesity: weight loss and bariatric surgery. Circ Res 118:1844–1855. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.307591 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (n.d.) Estimate of bariatric surgery numbers, 2011–2022. https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers/
-
- Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Vitiello A, Higa K, Himpens J, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N (2018) IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg 28:3783–3794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical