Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Aug;38(8):4594-4603.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10955-z. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

A superior approach? The role of robotic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with super super obesity using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A superior approach? The role of robotic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with super super obesity using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database

Alba Zevallos et al. Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with BMI ≥ 60 presents technical challenges, that might be overcome by robotic surgery, but its effectiveness has not been rigorously evaluated. We compared the 30-day outcomes of LSG and robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) in patients with BMI < 60 versus ≥ 60 and between LSG and RSG in patients with BMI ≥ 60.

Methods: Patients aged 18-65 years who underwent sleeve gastrectomy were included using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database. We performed a Propensity Score Matching analysis, with 21 preoperative characteristics. We compared 30-day postoperative outcomes for patients with BMI < 60 versus ≥ 60 using either a laparoscopic (Analysis 1) or robotic approach (Analysis 2) and compared LSG versus RSG in patients with BMI ≥ 60 (Analysis 3).

Results: 297,250 patients underwent LSG and 81,008 RSG. Propensity-matched¸ outcomes in analysis 1 (13,503 matched cases), showed that patients with BMI ≥ 60 had higher rates of mortality (0.1% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.014), staple line leak (0.3% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.035), postoperative bleeding (0.2% vs 0.1%, p = 0.028), readmissions (3.5% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001), and interventions (0.7% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.028) when compared to patients with BMI < 60. In analysis 2 (4350 matched cases), patients with BMI ≥ 60 demonstrated longer operative times, length of stay, and higher rates of unplanned ICU when compared to patients with BMI < 60. In analysis 3 (4370 matched cases), patients who underwent RSG had fewer readmissions (2.9% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.037), staple line leaks (0.1% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.029), and postoperative bleeding (0.1% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.045), compared to LSG. Conversely, a longer operative time (92.74 ± 38.65 vs. 71.69 ± 37.45 min, p < 0.001) was reported.

Conclusion: LSG patients with BMI ≥ 60 have higher rates of complications compared to patients with a BMI < 60. Moreover, some outcomes may be improved with the robotic approach in patients with BMI ≥ 60. These results underscore the importance of considering a robotic approach in this super super obese population.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery; Sleeve gastrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Obesity Foundation (2023) World obesity atlas 2023. https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/wof-files/World_Obesity_Atlas_2023_Re...
    1. Arterburn DE, Courcoulas AP (2014) Bariatric surgery for obesity and metabolic conditions in adults. BMJ 349:g3961. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3961 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Wolfe BM, Kvach E, Eckel RH (2016) Treatment of obesity: weight loss and bariatric surgery. Circ Res 118:1844–1855. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.307591 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (n.d.) Estimate of bariatric surgery numbers, 2011–2022. https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers/
    1. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, Vitiello A, Higa K, Himpens J, Buchwald H, Scopinaro N (2018) IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg 28:3783–3794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources