Field Study and Correlative Studies of Factor IX Variant FIX-R338L in Participants Treated with Fidanacogene Elaparvovec
- PMID: 38863155
- PMCID: PMC11436294
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787734
Field Study and Correlative Studies of Factor IX Variant FIX-R338L in Participants Treated with Fidanacogene Elaparvovec
Abstract
Background: Fidanacogene elaparvovec, an adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy vector expressing the high-activity factor IX (FIX) variant FIX-R338L, is in development for hemophilia B. One-stage clotting (OS) assays and chromogenic substrate (CS) assays are commonly used to measure FIX-R338L variant activity. Data from ongoing trials suggest FIX activity varies between different OS and CS assays.
Material and methods: To better understand FIX-R338L activity in clinical samples, an international multisite field study was conducted across a central laboratory and 18 local laboratories, using standard protocols, reagents, and instrumentation, with individual participant samples from a phase 1/2a study of fidanacogene elaparvovec.
Results: Unlike the wild-type FIX control, FIX-R338L activity was higher with the OS silica-based assay versus OS ellagic acid-based and CS assays. Variation in FIX activity was greater at the lowest activity levels. Activated FIX (FIXa) in plasma could result in higher OS assay activity or increased thrombin generation, which could overestimate FIX activity. However, FIXa was not detected in the participant samples, indicating that it was not contributing to the OS assay differences. Since individuals on gene therapy may receive exogenous replacement FIX products, replacement products were spiked into patient plasma samples to target a therapeutic concentration. Exogenous FIX was additive to endogenous FIX-R338L, with no interference from FIX-R338L.
Conclusion: These results demonstrate FIX-R338L activity can be measured with OS and CS assays in clinical laboratories and provide insight into assay variability when measuring FIX with endogenously produced FIX-R338L. The findings may help establish best practices for measuring FIX-R338L activity (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02484092).
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Conflict of interest statement
C.C., J.M., C.Y.T., J.Z.L., P.G., and J.R. are employees of Pfizer and may own stock/options in the company. D.D.P., H.S., S.R., J.-C.M., and J.E.M. were employees of Pfizer at the time of the study conduct and may own stock/options in the company.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Gene Therapy with Fidanacogene Elaparvovec in Adults with Hemophilia B.N Engl J Med. 2024 Sep 26;391(12):1108-1118. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302982. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 39321362 Clinical Trial.
-
Fidanacogene Elaparvovec for Hemophilia B - A Multiyear Follow-up Study.N Engl J Med. 2025 Apr 17;392(15):1508-1517. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307159. N Engl J Med. 2025. PMID: 40239068 Clinical Trial.
-
Factor IX assay discrepancies in the setting of liver gene therapy using a hyperfunctional variant factor IX-Padua.J Thromb Haemost. 2021 May;19(5):1212-1218. doi: 10.1111/jth.15281. Epub 2021 Mar 28. J Thromb Haemost. 2021. PMID: 33636038 Free PMC article.
-
Fidanacogene Elaparvovec: First Approval.Drugs. 2024 Apr;84(4):479-486. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02017-4. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Drugs. 2024. PMID: 38472707 Review.
-
Hemophilia Gene Therapy: Ready for Prime Time?Hum Gene Ther. 2017 Nov;28(11):1013-1023. doi: 10.1089/hum.2017.116. Epub 2017 Aug 3. Hum Gene Ther. 2017. PMID: 28793786 Review.
Cited by
-
A year in pharmacology: new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2024.Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 May;398(5):5077-5099. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04020-2. Epub 2025 Mar 31. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 40163152 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of One-Stage Assays for the Monitoring of Recombinant Human Factor IX Padua Activity After Etranacogene Dezaparvovec Gene Therapy.Haemophilia. 2025 Jul;31(4):799-806. doi: 10.1111/hae.70053. Epub 2025 Jun 18. Haemophilia. 2025. PMID: 40534246 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall Aet al.WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition Haemophilia 202026(suppl 6):1–158. - PubMed
-
- Hacker M R, Geraghty S, Manco-Johnson M. Barriers to compliance with prophylaxis therapy in haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2001;7(04):392–396. - PubMed
-
- Zappa S, McDaniel M, Marandola J, Allen G. Treatment trends for haemophilia A and haemophilia B in the United States: results from the 2010 practice patterns survey. Haemophilia. 2012;18(03):e140–e153. - PubMed
-
- De Moerloose P, Urbancik W, Van Den Berg H M, Richards M. A survey of adherence to haemophilia therapy in six European countries: results and recommendations. Haemophilia. 2008;14(05):931–938. - PubMed
-
- Thornburg C D, Pipe S W. Adherence to prophylactic infusions of factor VIII or factor IX for haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2006;12(02):198–199. - PubMed