Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 May 28:12:1388609.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1388609. eCollection 2024.

Anthropomorphic motion planning for multi-degree-of-freedom arms

Affiliations
Review

Anthropomorphic motion planning for multi-degree-of-freedom arms

Xiongfei Zheng et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

With the development of technology, the humanoid robot is no longer a concept, but a practical partner with the potential to assist people in industry, healthcare and other daily scenarios. The basis for the success of humanoid robots is not only their appearance, but more importantly their anthropomorphic behaviors, which is crucial for the human-robot interaction. Conventionally, robots are designed to follow meticulously calculated and planned trajectories, which typically rely on predefined algorithms and models, resulting in the inadaptability to unknown environments. Especially when faced with the increasing demand for personalized and customized services, predefined motion planning cannot be adapted in time to adapt to personal behavior. To solve this problem, anthropomorphic motion planning has become the focus of recent research with advances in biomechanics, neurophysiology, and exercise physiology which deepened the understanding of the body for generating and controlling movement. However, there is still no consensus on the criteria by which anthropomorphic motion is accurately generated and how to generate anthropomorphic motion. Although there are articles that provide an overview of anthropomorphic motion planning such as sampling-based, optimization-based, mimicry-based, and other methods, these methods differ only in the nature of the planning algorithms and have not yet been systematically discussed in terms of the basis for extracting upper limb motion characteristics. To better address the problem of anthropomorphic motion planning, the key milestones and most recent literature have been collated and summarized, and three crucial topics are proposed to achieve anthropomorphic motion, which are motion redundancy, motion variation, and motion coordination. The three characteristics are interrelated and interdependent, posing the challenge for anthropomorphic motion planning system. To provide some insights for the research on anthropomorphic motion planning, and improve the anthropomorphic motion ability, this article proposes a new taxonomy based on physiology, and a more complete system of anthropomorphic motion planning by providing a detailed overview of the existing methods and their contributions.

Keywords: anthropomorphic; arms; motion coordination; motion planning; motion redundancy; motion variation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
A frame of anthropomorphic motion planning system composed of three components.

Similar articles

References

    1. Albrecht S., Ramirez-Amaro K., Ruiz-Ugalde F., Weikersdorfer D., Leibold M., Ulbrich M., et al. (2011). “Imitating human reaching motions using physically inspired optimization principles,” in 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Bled, Slovenia: IEEE; ), 602–607. 10.1109/humanoids.2011.6100856 - DOI
    1. Arimoto S., Sekimoto M. (2006). “Human-like movements of robotic arms with redundant DOFs: virtual spring-damper hypothesis to tackle the Bernstein problem,” in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Orlando, Florida, USA: IEEE; ), 1860–1866. 10.1109/robot.2006.1641977 - DOI
    1. Arkin R. C., Moshkina L. (2014). “Affect in human-robot interaction,” in The oxford handbook of affective computing. Editor Calvo R. (Oxford: Oxford University Press; ), 483–493.
    1. Artemiadis P. K., Katsiaris P. T., Kyriakopoulos K. J. (2010). A biomimetic approach to inverse kinematics for a redundant robot arm. Aut. Robots 29 (3-4), 293–308. 10.1007/s10514-010-9196-x - DOI
    1. Atkeson C. G., Hollerbach J. M. (1985). Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J. Neurosci. 5 (9), 2318–2330. 10.1523/jneurosci.05-09-02318.1985 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources