Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 28:14:1388626.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1388626. eCollection 2024.

Robotic distal gastrectomy using a novel pre-emptive supra-pancreatic approach without duodenal transection in the dissection of D2 lymph nodes for gastric cancer

Affiliations

Robotic distal gastrectomy using a novel pre-emptive supra-pancreatic approach without duodenal transection in the dissection of D2 lymph nodes for gastric cancer

Jianming Xie et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted surgery has shown remarkable progress as a minimally invasive procedure for gastric cancer. This study aimed to compare the pre-emptive suprapancreatic approach without duodenal transection and the conventional approach in terms of perioperative feasibility and short-term surgical outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent robotic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection using the da Vinci Xi robotic system between December 2021 and April 2023 and categorized them into two groups for comparison. Patients treated using the pre-emptive suprapancreatic approach (observation group) were compared with those who received the conventional approach (control group). Employing one-to-one propensity score matching, we evaluated the postoperative morbidity and short-term outcomes in these two distinct groups to assess the efficacy and safety of the novel surgical technique.

Results: This study enrolled 131 patients: 70 in the observation group and 61 in the control group. After propensity score matching, the operative times were significantly longer in the control group than in the observation group (229.10 ± 33.96 vs. 174.84 ± 18.37, p <0.001). The mean blood loss was lower in the observation group than in the control group (25.20 ± 11.18 vs. 85.00 ± 38.78, p <0.001). Additionally, the observation group exhibited a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes, including suprapyloric, perigastric, and superior pancreatic lymph nodes (28.69 ± 5.48 vs. 19.21 ± 2.89, p <0.001; 4.98 ± 1.27 vs. 4.29 ± 1.21, p = 0.012; 10.52 ± 2.39 vs. 5.50 ± 1.62, p <0.001; 6.26 ± 2.64 vs. 5.00 ± 1.72, p = 0.029). Drain amylase levels in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (30.08 ± 33.74 vs. 69.14 ± 66.81, p <0.001).

Conclusion: This study revealed that using the pre-emptive suprapancreatic approach without duodenal transection in the dissection of D2 lymph nodes for gastric cancer is a safe and feasible procedure in terms of surgical outcomes.

Keywords: gastric cancer; gastrointestinal surgery; lymph node dissection; pre-emptive supra-pancreatic approach; robotic distal gastrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preemptive supra-pancreatic approach without duodenal transection. ① Schematic diagram of the novel approach. ② Tumor localization. ③ Dissection of suprapyloric lymph nodes. ④\⑤ Dissection of superior pancreatic lymph nodes. ⑥ Dissection of NO.4sb lymph nodes. ⑦ Dissection of Subpyloric lymph nodes. ⑧ Billroth II gastrojejunal anastomosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative survival curves for patients undergoing preemptive suprapancreatic approach without duodenal transection and the conventional approach after propensity score matching. The 1-year overall survival rate did not differ significantly between the observation and control groups (97.8% vs.95.6%, respectively; log-rank p = 0.543).

Similar articles

References

    1. Zhou T, Wu L, Ma N, Tang F, Chen J, Jiang Z, et al. . Photothermally responsive theranostic nanocomposites for near-infrared light triggered drug release and enhanced synergism of photothermo-chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Bioeng Transl Med. (2022) 8(1):e10368. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10368 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhan W, Hu M, Han C, Tian H, Jing W, Li X, et al. . Safety and effectiveness of the da Vinci robot with the “3 + 2” mode for distal pancreatectomy. Cancer Med. (2019) 8:4226–34. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2353 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hashizume M, Shimada M, Tomikawa M, Ikeda Y, Takahashi I, Abe R, et al. . Early experiences of endoscopic procedures in general surgery assisted by a computer-enhanced surgical system. Surg Endoscopy. (2002) 16:1187–91. doi: 10.1007/s004640080154 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. (2009) 249:927–32. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000351688.64999.73 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park JY, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Eom BW, Yoon HM, Reim D. Emerging role of robot-assisted gastrectomy: analysis of consecutive 200 cases. J Gastric Cancer. (2013) 13:255–62. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2013.13.4.255 - DOI - PMC - PubMed