Preference and Associated Factors for Cesarean Delivery Among Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study
- PMID: 38863842
- PMCID: PMC11162879
- DOI: 10.18502/jfrh.v18i1.15435
Preference and Associated Factors for Cesarean Delivery Among Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study
Abstract
Objective: A cesarean delivery is regarded as a comparatively favourable and secure approach to childbirth when contrasted with vaginal delivery. Over the past decade, its frequency has risen in both industrialized and developing nations. Maternal request for cesarean delivery has been explained for the escalating rate along with other factors like anxiety, fear of childbirth, previous cesarean delivery, previous negative vaginal birth experience, maternal age, maternal education, and socioeconomic factors. Hence, this study was undertaken to assess pregnant women's tendency to have a cesarean birth and to investigate the factors associated with the inclination for cesarean delivery.
Materials and methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of a tertiary care hospital, a systematic sampling procedure was utilized, and 368 antenatal mothers after 36 weeks of gestation, who do not have any specific medical reasons against vaginal delivery were included in the study. Data collection was done by questionnaire. The information regarding socio-demographic factors, preexisting comorbidities, current obstetric risk factors, emotional factors, previous delivery experience, and their information preference toward the mode of delivery were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify the independent variables associated with preference for cesarean delivery.
Results: The preference for cesarean delivery and non-preference for cesarean delivery was 114 (30.9%) and 201 (54.6%), respectively whereas 53 (14.4%) participants remained neutral. The Chi-square analysis revealed a notable connection between the inclination towards a preference for cesarean delivery and factors such as obstetric score, parity, comorbidities, and among obstetric risk factors such as pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization (IVF), with a history of abortion, and having a prior history of cesarean delivery. Nevertheless, no meaningful association was observed between the preference for cesarean delivery and the remaining variables. On multivariate logistic analysis, independent variables like preexisting anxiety or depression, pregnancy through IVF, and having a history of previous cesarean delivery have increased the odds of preferring cesarean delivery. The independent variables like increasing gestational age, graduates, and unemployed have decreased the odds of preferring a cesarean delivery.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the prevalence of cesarean delivery is influenced by a complex interplay of medical, cultural, socioeconomic, and healthcare system factors. While cesarean delivery is essential in cases of medical necessity, efforts should be made to avoid unnecessary cesarean delivery that does not provide clear benefits over vaginal delivery. Balancing the risks and benefits of cesarean delivery and promoting evidence-based obstetric practices are crucial for ensuring optimal maternal and infant outcomes.
Keywords: Cesarean Delivery; Cesarean Section; Obstetrics; Patient Preference; Pregnant Women.
Copyright © 2024 Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interests Authors declare no conflict of interests.
Similar articles
-
Women's antenatal preferences for delivery route in a setting with high cesarean section rates and a medically dominated maternity system.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Apr;93(4):408-15. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12353. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014. PMID: 24575805
-
Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x. Birth. 2008. PMID: 18507583
-
Pregnant women's preference for cesarean section and subsequent mode of birth - a six-country cohort study.J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Sep;37(3):75-83. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2016.1181055. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2016. PMID: 27269591
-
Reasons for elective cesarean section on maternal request: a systematic review.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Nov;33(22):3867-3872. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1587407. Epub 2019 Mar 8. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020. PMID: 30810436
-
Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Sep;170(1):25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. PMID: 23810846 Review.
References
-
- Leone T, Padmadas SS, Matthews Z. Community factors affecting rising cesarean section rates in developing countries: an analysis of six countries. Soc Sci Med. 2008; 67(8):1236–46. - PubMed
-
- Niranjan Chavan. “Cesarean Delivery.” In Labour Room Emergencies, pp. 297–303. Springer, Singapore, 2020.
-
- Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Births: Preliminary data for 2012. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 62 no 3. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr62/nvsr62_03.pdf. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous