The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
- PMID: 38864006
- PMCID: PMC11165650
- DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae191
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section, we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of National Academy of Sciences.
Similar articles
-
Beyond the Screen: The Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Patient Learning and the Patient-Physician Relationship.Cureus. 2025 Jan 2;17(1):e76825. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76825. eCollection 2025 Jan. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 39897260 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safeguarding human values: rethinking US law for generative AI's societal impacts.AI Ethics. 2025;5(2):1433-1459. doi: 10.1007/s43681-024-00451-4. Epub 2024 May 7. AI Ethics. 2025. PMID: 40352581 Free PMC article.
-
[Subverting the Future of Teaching: Artificial Intelligence Innovation in Nursing Education].Hu Li Za Zhi. 2024 Apr;71(2):20-25. doi: 10.6224/JN.202404_71(2).04. Hu Li Za Zhi. 2024. PMID: 38532671 Chinese.
-
Tool or Tyrant: Guiding and Guarding Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Nursing Education.Creat Nurs. 2024 May;30(2):125-132. doi: 10.1177/10784535241247094. Epub 2024 Apr 23. Creat Nurs. 2024. PMID: 38651267
-
The Role of AI in Hospitals and Clinics: Transforming Healthcare in the 21st Century.Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Mar 29;11(4):337. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11040337. Bioengineering (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38671759 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Social connection as a critical factor for mental and physical health: evidence, trends, challenges, and future implications.World Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;23(3):312-332. doi: 10.1002/wps.21224. World Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 39279411 Free PMC article.
-
Inequalities in the Distribution of the Nursing Workforce in Albania: A Regional Analysis Using the Gini Coefficient.Nurs Rep. 2025 Jan 22;15(2):30. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15020030. Nurs Rep. 2025. PMID: 39997766 Free PMC article.
-
Private equity and reproductive medicine: "Fertile breeding ground" - a physician's perspective".Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025 Aug 1;23(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12958-025-01446-4. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 40751202 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A community-based approach to ethical decision-making in artificial intelligence for health care.JAMIA Open. 2025 Aug 7;8(4):ooaf076. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf076. eCollection 2025 Aug. JAMIA Open. 2025. PMID: 40799930 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Artificial Intelligence Use in Medical Education: Best Practices and Future Directions.Curr Urol Rep. 2025 May 29;26(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s11934-025-01277-1. Curr Urol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40439780 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bubeck S, et al. 2023. Sparks of artificial general intelligence: early experiments with GPT-4. arXiv 12712. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712, preprint: not peer reviewed.
-
- Bostrom N. 2017. Superintelligence. Paris: Dunod.
-
- Kranzberg M. 1985. The information age: evolution or revolution. Inform Technol Soc Tansf. 35–54. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/166/chapter/5
-
- Gigerenzer G. 2022. How to stay smart in a smart world: why human intelligence still beats algorithms. Cambridge: MIT Press.
-
- Dwivedi YK, et al. 2023. “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int J Inf Manage. 71:102642.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources