Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan-Dec:15:21501319241259915.
doi: 10.1177/21501319241259915.

Effort Required and Lessons Learned From Recruiting Health Plans and Rural Primary Care Practices for a Cancer Screening Outreach Study

Affiliations

Effort Required and Lessons Learned From Recruiting Health Plans and Rural Primary Care Practices for a Cancer Screening Outreach Study

Brittany Badicke et al. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Recruiting organizations (i.e., health plans, health systems, or clinical practices) is important for implementation science, yet limited research explores effective strategies for engaging organizations in pragmatic studies. We explore the effort required to meet recruitment targets for a pragmatic implementation trial, characteristics of engaged and non-engaged clinical practices, and reasons health plans and rural clinical practices chose to participate.

Methods: We explored recruitment activities and factors associated with organizational enrollment in SMARTER CRC, a randomized pragmatic trial to increase rates of CRC screening in rural populations. We sought to recruit 30 rural primary care practices within participating Medicaid health plans. We tracked recruitment outreach contacts, meeting content, and outcomes using tracking logs. Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we analyzed interviews, surveys, and publicly available clinical practice data to identify facilitators of participation.

Results: Overall recruitment activities spanned January 2020 to April 2021. Five of the 9 health plans approached agreed to participate (55%). Three of the health plans chose to operate centrally as 1 site based on network structure, resulting in 3 recruited health plan sites. Of the 101 identified practices, 76 met study eligibility criteria; 51% (n = 39) enrolled. Between recruitment and randomization, 1 practice was excluded, 5 withdrew, and 7 practices were collapsed into 3 sites for randomization purposes based on clinical practice structure, leaving 29 randomized sites. Successful recruitment required iterative outreach across time, with a range of 2 to 17 encounters per clinical practice. Facilitators to recruitment included multi-modal outreach, prior relationships, effective messaging, flexibility, and good timing.

Conclusion: Recruiting health plans and rural clinical practices was complex and iterative. Leveraging existing relationships and allocating time and resources to engage clinical practices in pragmatic implementation research may facilitate more diverse representation in future trials and generalizability of research findings.

Keywords: cancer screening; cancer screening outreach; clinical practice-health plan partnership; pragmatic trial; primary care; recruitment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: From 2021 to 2023, Dr. Coronado served as PI on a contract through the Center for Health Research funded by Guardant Health that assessed adherence to a commercially available blood test for colorectal cancer.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Health plan and clinical practice recruitment consort diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Recruitment Effort for Recruited Clinical Practices by Health Plan (N = 39).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Solberg LI. Recruiting medical groups for research: relationships, reputation, requirements, rewards, reciprocity, resolution, and respect. Implement Sci. 2006;1:25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine, Policy, et al.. The National Academies Collection: reports funded by National Institutes of Health. In: Bibbins-Domingo K, Helman A, eds. Improving Representation in Clinical Trials and Research: Building Research Equity for Women and Underrepresented Groups. National Academies Press; 2022. - PubMed
    1. Foutz JA, Samantha A, Garfield R. The Role of Medicaid in Rural America. 2017. Accessed October 4, 2022. https://files.kff.org/attachment/Issue-Brief-The-Role-of-Medicaid-in-Rur...
    1. Cromartie J, Dobis EA, Krumel TP, McGranahan D, Pender J. Rural America at a Glance. 2020. Accessed 2022. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/100089/eib-221.pdf?v=2348.2
    1. Blake KD, Moss JL, Gaysynsky A, Srinivasan S, Croyle RT. Making the case for investment in rural cancer control: an analysis of rural cancer incidence, mortality, and funding trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(7):992-997. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms