Effort Required and Lessons Learned From Recruiting Health Plans and Rural Primary Care Practices for a Cancer Screening Outreach Study
- PMID: 38864248
- PMCID: PMC11177742
- DOI: 10.1177/21501319241259915
Effort Required and Lessons Learned From Recruiting Health Plans and Rural Primary Care Practices for a Cancer Screening Outreach Study
Abstract
Introduction: Recruiting organizations (i.e., health plans, health systems, or clinical practices) is important for implementation science, yet limited research explores effective strategies for engaging organizations in pragmatic studies. We explore the effort required to meet recruitment targets for a pragmatic implementation trial, characteristics of engaged and non-engaged clinical practices, and reasons health plans and rural clinical practices chose to participate.
Methods: We explored recruitment activities and factors associated with organizational enrollment in SMARTER CRC, a randomized pragmatic trial to increase rates of CRC screening in rural populations. We sought to recruit 30 rural primary care practices within participating Medicaid health plans. We tracked recruitment outreach contacts, meeting content, and outcomes using tracking logs. Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we analyzed interviews, surveys, and publicly available clinical practice data to identify facilitators of participation.
Results: Overall recruitment activities spanned January 2020 to April 2021. Five of the 9 health plans approached agreed to participate (55%). Three of the health plans chose to operate centrally as 1 site based on network structure, resulting in 3 recruited health plan sites. Of the 101 identified practices, 76 met study eligibility criteria; 51% (n = 39) enrolled. Between recruitment and randomization, 1 practice was excluded, 5 withdrew, and 7 practices were collapsed into 3 sites for randomization purposes based on clinical practice structure, leaving 29 randomized sites. Successful recruitment required iterative outreach across time, with a range of 2 to 17 encounters per clinical practice. Facilitators to recruitment included multi-modal outreach, prior relationships, effective messaging, flexibility, and good timing.
Conclusion: Recruiting health plans and rural clinical practices was complex and iterative. Leveraging existing relationships and allocating time and resources to engage clinical practices in pragmatic implementation research may facilitate more diverse representation in future trials and generalizability of research findings.
Keywords: cancer screening; cancer screening outreach; clinical practice-health plan partnership; pragmatic trial; primary care; recruitment.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: From 2021 to 2023, Dr. Coronado served as PI on a contract through the Center for Health Research funded by Guardant Health that assessed adherence to a commercially available blood test for colorectal cancer.
Figures
Similar articles
-
An observational study of workflows to support fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices serving Medicaid enrollees.BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 25;22(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09106-7. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35078444 Free PMC article.
-
Mailed fecal testing and patient navigation versus usual care to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening and follow-up colonoscopy in rural Medicaid enrollees: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Apr 13;3(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00285-3. Implement Sci Commun. 2022. PMID: 35418107 Free PMC article.
-
Recruiting community health centers into pragmatic research: Findings from STOP CRC.Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):214-22. doi: 10.1177/1740774515608122. Epub 2015 Sep 29. Clin Trials. 2016. PMID: 26419905 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Development, acceptability, appropriateness and appeal of a cancer clinical trials implementation intervention for rural- and minority-serving urology practices.Trials. 2019 Oct 7;20(1):578. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3658-z. Trials. 2019. PMID: 31590694 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Facilitators and barriers to pediatric clinical trial recruitment and retention in rural and community settings: A scoping review of the literature.Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Apr;15(4):838-853. doi: 10.1111/cts.13220. Epub 2022 Jan 21. Clin Transl Sci. 2022. PMID: 35037409 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Mailed Outreach and Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0928. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40094661 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine, Policy, et al.. The National Academies Collection: reports funded by National Institutes of Health. In: Bibbins-Domingo K, Helman A, eds. Improving Representation in Clinical Trials and Research: Building Research Equity for Women and Underrepresented Groups. National Academies Press; 2022. - PubMed
-
- Foutz JA, Samantha A, Garfield R. The Role of Medicaid in Rural America. 2017. Accessed October 4, 2022. https://files.kff.org/attachment/Issue-Brief-The-Role-of-Medicaid-in-Rur...
-
- Cromartie J, Dobis EA, Krumel TP, McGranahan D, Pender J. Rural America at a Glance. 2020. Accessed 2022. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/100089/eib-221.pdf?v=2348.2
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous