The Fate of The Broken Tether: How Do Curves Treated With Vertebral Body Tethering Behave After Tether Breakage?
- PMID: 38864265
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005072
The Fate of The Broken Tether: How Do Curves Treated With Vertebral Body Tethering Behave After Tether Breakage?
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective, multicenter.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess curve progression and occurrence of revision surgery following tether breakage after vertebral body tethering (VBT).
Summary of background data: Tether breakage after VBT is common with rates up to 50% reported. In these cases, it remains unknown whether the curve will progress or remain stable.
Materials and methods: Adolescent and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis patients in a multicenter registry with ≥2-year-follow-up after VBT were reviewed. Broken tethers were listed as postoperative complications and identified by increased screw divergence of >5 degrees on serial radiographs. Revision procedures and curve magnitude at subsequent visits were recorded.
Results: Of 186 patients who qualified for inclusion, 84 (45.2%) patients with tether breakage were identified with a mean age at VBT of 12.4±1.4 years and mean curve magnitude at index procedure of 51.8±8.1 degrees. Tether breakage occurred at a mean of 30.3±11.8 months and mean curve of 33.9±13.2 degrees. Twelve patients (12/84, 14.5%) underwent 13 revision procedures after tether breakage, including six tether revisions and seven conversions to fusion. All tether revisions occurred within 5 months of breakage identification. No patients with curves <35 degrees after breakage underwent revision. Revision rate was greatest in skeletally immature (Risser 0-3) patients with curves ≥35 degrees at time of breakage (Risser 0-3: 9/17, 53% vs. Risser 4-5: 3/23, 13%, P =0.01). Curves increased by 3.1 and 3.7 degrees in the first and second year, respectively. By 2 years, 15/30 (50%) progressed >5 degrees and 8/30 (26.7%) progressed >10 degrees. Overall, 66.7% (40/60) reached a curve magnitude >35 degrees at their latest follow-up, and 14/60 (23.3%) reached a curve magnitude >45 degrees. Skeletal maturity did not affect curve progression after tether breakage ( P >0.26), but time to rupture did ( P =0.048).
Conclusions: While skeletal immaturity and curve magnitude were not independently associated with curve progression, skeletally immature patients with curves ≥35 degrees at time of rupture are most likely to undergo additional surgery. Most patients can expect progression at least 5 degrees in the first 2 years after tether breakage, though longer term behavior remains unknown.
Level of evidence: Level III.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
K.D.I.: Orthopediatrics (consultant). M.C.W.: DePuy Synthes (consultant, speaker’s bureau, advisory board or panel); Stryker Spine (consultant, speaker’s bureau); Nuvasive (consultant, speaker’s bureau); Zimmer Biomet (grants/research support, advisory board or panel); Alexion/Astrozenica (consultant). J.T.S.: Globus Medical [consultant, other financial or material support (royalties, patents, etc.)]; NuVasive (consultant); Wishbone (consultant); GS Medical (consultant); Zimvie (consultant). R.E.-H.: DePuy Synthes (grants/research support, consultant); Medtronic (grants/research support, consultant); OrthoPediatrics [consultant, stock/shareholder (self-managed), advisory board or panel]; Zimmer Biomet (grants/research support). K.M.C.: Medtronic (consultant); NuVasive (grants/research support, consultant); Globus Medical (consultant); Avalon spinecare (grants/research support); AO Spine (grants/research support); OrthoSmart [other financial or material support (royalties, patents, etc.)]. D.L.S.: Biomet spine [other financial or material support (royalties, patents, etc.)]; Grand Rounds (a Healthcare Navigation Company) (consultant); Green Sun Medical [stock/shareholder (self-managed)]; NuVasive (grants/research support, consultant); Orthobullets [consultant, stock/shareholder (self-managed), advisory board or panel]; Orthopaedics Today (advisory board or panel); Wolters Kluwer Health—Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins [other financial or material support (royalties, patents, etc.)]; Zimmer Biomet [consultant, speaker’s bureau, other financial or material support (royalties, patents, etc.)]; Zipline Medical [stock/shareholder (self-managed)]. L.M.A.: Eli Lilly [stock/shareholder (self-managed)]; Medtronic (consultant, speaker’s bureau); Orthobullets [other financial or material support (royalties, patents, etc.]; Zimmer Biomet (consultant, speaker’s bureau); Nuvasive (consultant, speaker’s bureau). The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Hueter C. Anatomische Studien an den Extremitatengelenken Neugoeborener und Erwachsener [Anatomic studies on the joints of the extremities in newborns and adults]. Virchow Arch. 1862;26:484–519.
-
- Louer CR. Growth modulation response in thoracic VBT depends on magnitude of concave vertebral body growth. Charleston, SC: International Congress on Early Onset Scoliosis and the Growing Spine; 2023.
-
- Newton PO, Takahashi Y, Yang Y, et al. Anterior vertebral body tethering for thoracic idiopathic scoliosis leads to asymmetric growth of the periapical vertebrae. Spine Deform. 2022;10:553–561.
-
- McDonald TC, Shah SA, Hargiss JB, et al. When successful, anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) induces differential segmental growth of vertebrae: an in vivo study of 51 patients and 764 vertebrae. Spine Deform. 2022;10:791–797.
-
- Buyuk AF, Milbrandt TA, Mathew SE, et al. Measurable thoracic motion remains at 1 year following anterior vertebral body tethering, with sagittal motion greater than coronal motion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103:2299–2305.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials