Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;64(8):1459-1468.
doi: 10.1111/trf.17916. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

Modeling US blood donor deferrals under a policy of individual risk assessment for HIV risk sexual behavior

Affiliations

Modeling US blood donor deferrals under a policy of individual risk assessment for HIV risk sexual behavior

Barbee I Whitaker et al. Transfusion. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Background: In May 2023, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released final guidance for blood donor eligibility that recommended the elimination of 3-month deferral for men who have sex with men (MSM) and the related deferral for women who have sex with MSM. In its place, FDA introduced an individual risk assessment policy of asking all presenting blood donors, regardless of sex or gender, if they have had a new partner or more than one sexual partner in the last 3 months and deferring those who also report anal sex (penile-anal intercourse) during this period. We modeled the possible impact of this policy on the US blood donor base.

Study design and methods: We developed a computational model to estimate the percentage of blood donors who would be deferred under a policy of individual HIV risk assessment. The model incorporated demographic information about donors and national survey data on HIV risk behaviors and included age and sex distributions and dependencies.

Results: Our model estimates that approximately 1.2% of US blood donors would be deferred under the individual HIV risk assessment paradigm.

Discussion: The model predicts a relatively minor effect of replacing the time-based deferral for MSM with individual risk-based deferral for sexual behavior. As US blood centers implement this new policy, the effect may be mitigated by donor gains, which warrant further study. The new policy is unlikely to adversely affect the availability of blood and blood components.

Keywords: HIV risk assessment; MSM deferral; anal sex; blood donor deferral; blood donor loss; modeling; sexual partner; transfusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest:

No conflict of interest declared.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Donor Individual Risk Algorithm and Key Data Sources. TTIMS, Transfusion-Transmissible Infections Monitoring System; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NSSHB, National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Numbers of donors by age and sex from the TTIMS program, which represents approximately 60% of the blood supply. TTIMS, Transfusion-Transmissible Infections Monitoring System
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Mean Proportion of Having New or Multiple Sexual Partners for Men and Women in the U.S. by Age, Based on NHANES (2015–2016).
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Input Distributions for Anal Sex Rates in the Past Year for Men and Women in the U.S. by Age Based on NSSHB (2009).
Figure 5:
Figure 5:
Estimated Mean Percent Donor Deferred Based on NSSHB (2022). The mean proportion of donors that would be deferred for each age group was estimated. NSSHB, National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior
Figure 6:
Figure 6:
Probability Distributions of Donor Deferral Estimates for the U.S. TTIMS blood donor data and the input distributions of sexual behaviors were used to estimate the percent donor deferral and its uncertainties under the individual HIV sexual risk-behavior donor deferral policy. Mean value (1.2%) of deferred donors estimated from using TTIMS (2021), NHANES (2015–2016), and NSSHB (2009) data was the same as that estimated from using the TTIMS (2021) and NSSHB (2022) data. TTIMS, Transfusion-Transmissible Infections Monitoring System; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NSSHB, National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior

Similar articles

References

    1. Institute of Medicine Committee to Study HIV Transmission Through Blood. HIV and the Blood Supply: An Analysis of Crisis Decisionmaking. In: Leveton LB, Sox HC Jr., Stoto MA, eds. HIV and the Blood Supply: An Analysis of Crisis Decisionmaking. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 1995. - PubMed
    1. CDC. Human immunodeficiency virus infection in transfusion recipients and their family members. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1987;36: 137–40. - PubMed
    1. CDC. Possible transfusion-associated acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) - California . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1982;31: 652–4. - PubMed
    1. CDC. Update: revised Public Health Service definition of persons who should refrain from donating blood and plasma--United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1985;34: 547–8. - PubMed
    1. FDA. Recommendations to Decrease the Risk of Transmitting Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) from Blood Donors, March 24, 1983.

Publication types