Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 22;110(5):1444-1450.
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae391.

Lower Independent Self-Care Readiness Persists Over Time in Teens With Type 1 Diabetes and Executive Function Challenges

Rebecca J Vitale  1   2 , Liane J Tinsley  1 , Lisa K Volkening  1 , Lori M Laffel  1
Affiliations

Lower Independent Self-Care Readiness Persists Over Time in Teens With Type 1 Diabetes and Executive Function Challenges

Rebecca J Vitale et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. .

Abstract

Purpose: Management of type 1 diabetes is complex and benefits from adequate executive function (EF) (planning, organization, problem-solving). Teens with diabetes and executive dysfunction may have challenges with the acquisition of self-care skills.

Methods: Over 18 months, parents of teens with type 1 diabetes aged 13 to 17 completed the Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (DFRQ) and Readiness for Independent Self-Care Questionnaire (RISQ) every 6 months. Parents assessed teen EF, completing the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). T-score ≥60 defined EF challenges. EF, demographic, and diabetes treatment variables predicted RISQ score over time using longitudinal mixed modeling with false discovery rate adjustment.

Results: There were 169 teen participants (54% male) aged 15.9 ± 1.3 years, diabetes duration 8.4 ± 3.7 years, and A1c 8.6 ± 1.2%. About a third (31.4%) of teens had parent-reported BRIEF Global Executive Composite (GEC) scores ≥60. After adjusting for age, sex, and DFRQ, those with GEC <60 had a RISQ score 4.1 points higher than those with GEC ≥60, P = .016. Metacognition index (MI; adjusted for age,sex, and DFRQ) predicted RISQ while behavioral regulation index (adjusted for age, continuous glucose monitor use, DFRQ, and A1c) did not; those with MI <60 had a RISQ score 5.3 points higher than those with MI ≥60, P < .001. In all models, older teen age (P < .05) and less parental involvement (P < .001) predicted higher RISQ score.

Conclusion: EF skills, especially metacognition, appear important for the acquisition of self-care behaviors in teens with type 1 diabetes. Evaluating EF during adolescence may identify teens needing extra support during the transition process.

Keywords: adolescence; adolescent self-management; comorbidities-neuropsychiatric; transition; type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
RISQ score over time stratified by executive function status assessed by (A) GEC, (B) MI, (C) BRI. (A) black circles = GEC <60, grey squares = GEC ≥60. (B) black circles = MI <60, grey squares = MI ≥60. (C) black circles = BRI <60, grey squares = BRI ≥60. Abbreviations: BRI, Behavioral Regulation Index; GEC, Global Executive Composite; MI, Metacognition Index; RISQ, Readiness for Independent Self-Care Questionnaire.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sperling MA, Laffel LM. Current management of glycemia in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(12):1155‐1164. - PubMed
    1. Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW, et al. Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(6):971‐978. - PubMed
    1. Hannon TS, Janosky J, Arslanian SA. Longitudinal study of physiologic insulin resistance and metabolic changes of puberty. Pediatr Res. 2006;60(6):759‐763. - PubMed
    1. King PS, Berg CA, Butner J, Butler JM, Wiebe DJ. Longitudinal trajectories of parental involvement in type 1 diabetes and adolescents’ adherence. Health Psychol. 2014;33(5):424‐432. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suchy Y. Executive functioning: overview, assessment, and research issues for non-neuropsychologists. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37(2):106‐116. - PubMed