Material and abutment selection for CAD/CAM implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients - A narrative review
- PMID: 38864592
- DOI: 10.1111/clr.14315
Material and abutment selection for CAD/CAM implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients - A narrative review
Abstract
Restorative material selection has become increasingly challenging due to the speed of new developments in the field of dental material science. The present narrative review gives an overview of the current indications for implant abutments and restoration materials for provisional and definitive implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients. For single implant restorations, titanium base abutments for crowns are suggested as an alternative to the conventional stock- and customized abutments made out of metal or zirconia. They combine the mechanical stability of a metallic connection with the esthetic potential of ceramics. For multiple-unit restorations, conical titanium bases especially designed for bridges are recommended, to compensate for deviating implant insertion axes and angulations. Even though titanium base abutments with different geometries and heights are available, certain clinical scenarios still benefit from customized titanium abutments. Indications for the definitive material in fixed implant restorations depend on the region of tooth replacement. In the posterior (not esthetically critical) zone, ceramics such as zirconia (3-5-Ymol%) and lithium-disilicate are recommended to be used in a monolithic fashion. In the anterior sector, ceramic restorations may be buccally micro-veneered for an optimal esthetic appearance. Lithium-disilicate is only recommended for single-crowns, while zirconia (3-5-Ymol%) is also recommended for multiple-unit and cantilever restorations. Attention must be given to the specific mechanical properties of different types of zirconia, as some feature reduced mechanical strengths and are therefore not indicated for all regions and restoration span lengths. Metal-ceramics remain an option, especially for cantilever restorations.
Keywords: CAD‐CAM; Implant‐supported; dental abutments; dental implants; dental prosthesis.
© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Load-bearing capacity of screw-retained fixed dental prostheses made of monolithic zirconia on different abutment designs and abutment-free implant connection.J Dent. 2025 Feb;153:105561. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105561. Epub 2025 Jan 6. J Dent. 2025. PMID: 39778736
-
The clinical use of computer aided designed/computer aided manufactured titanium nitride coated implant abutments: Surgical and prosthetic considerations-A case series.J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Oct;35(7):1008-1021. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13035. Epub 2023 Mar 18. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023. PMID: 36932837
-
The effect of different abutment and restorative crown materials on stress distribution in single-unit implant-supported restorations: A 3D finite element stress analysis.J Prosthodont. 2024 Jun;33(5):497-505. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13732. Epub 2023 Jul 20. J Prosthodont. 2024. PMID: 37434476
-
Metal-free implant-supported single-tooth restorations. Part I: Abutments and cemented crowns.Quintessence Int. 2019;50(3):176-184. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a41906. Quintessence Int. 2019. PMID: 30773569 Review.
-
Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Oct;14(5):633-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00317.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 21176095 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Surface Treatments and Thermal Aging on Bond Strength Between Veneering Resin and CAD/CAM Provisional Materials.Polymers (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;17(5):563. doi: 10.3390/polym17050563. Polymers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40076056 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing Smile Aesthetics and Function with Lithium Disilicate Veneers: A Brief Review and Case Study.Clin Pract. 2025 Mar 18;15(3):66. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15030066. Clin Pract. 2025. PMID: 40136602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adaptation assessment of all-ceramic self-glazed versus conventional zirconia implant abutments.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 14;25(1):1158. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06572-4. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40660188 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Abad‐Coronel, C., Calle, C., Abril, G., Paltán, C. A., & Fajardo, J. I. (2023). Fracture resistance analysis of CAD/CAM interim fixed prosthodontic materials: PMMA, graphene, acetal resin and Polysulfone. Polymers (Basel), 15(7), 1761.
-
- Aglietta, M., Siciliano, V. I., Zwahlen, M., Brägger, U., Pjetursson, B. E., Lang, N. P., & Salvi, G. E. (2009). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20(5), 441–451.
-
- Agustin‐Panadero, R., Soriano‐Valero, S., Labaig‐Rueda, C., Fernandez‐Estevan, L., & Sola‐Ruiz, M. F. (2020). Implant‐supported metal‐ceramic and resin‐modified ceramic crowns: A 5‐year prospective clinical study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 124(1), 46–52.
-
- Alexakou, E., Damanaki, M., Zoidis, P., Bakiri, E., Mouzis, N., Smidt, G., & Kourtis, S. (2019). PEEK high performance polymers: A review of properties and clinical applications in prosthodontics and restorative dentistry. The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 27(3), 113–121.
-
- Alqurashi, H., Khurshid, Z., Syed, A. U. Y., Rashid Habib, S., Rokaya, D., & Zafar, M. S. (2021). Polyetherketoneketone (PEKK): An emerging biomaterial for oral implants and dental prostheses. Journal of Advanced Research, 28, 87–95.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous