Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024;19(8):667-679.
doi: 10.2217/fmb-2023-0271. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

Biosurfactant complexed with arginine has antibiofilm activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Affiliations

Biosurfactant complexed with arginine has antibiofilm activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Fatima Daiana Dias Barroso et al. Future Microbiol. 2024.

Abstract

Aim: The present study investigated the antimicrobial effectiveness of a rhamnolipid complexed with arginine (RLMIX_Arg) against planktonic cells and biofilms of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Methodology: Susceptibility testing was performed using the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute protocol: M07-A10, checkerboard test, biofilm in plates and catheters and flow cytometry were used. Result: RLMIX_Arg has bactericidal and synergistic activity with oxacillin. RLMIX_Arg inhibits the formation of MRSA biofilms on plates at sub-inhibitory concentrations and has antibiofilm action against MRSA in peripheral venous catheters. Catheters impregnated with RLMIX_Arg reduce the formation of MRSA biofilms. Conclusion: RLMIX_Arg exhibits potential for application in preventing infections related to methicillin-resistant S. aureus biofilms.

Keywords: MRSA; Staphylococcus aureus; biofilms; medical catheter; surfactants.

Plain language summary

[Box: see text].

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests or relevant affiliations with any organization or entity with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Effect of RLMIX_Arg on the cell viability of preformed 48 h biofilms of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in 96-well plates after 24 h of incubation. (A) * p < 0.05 compared with control / ** p < 0.01 compared with control/ *** p < 0.001 compared with control/ # compared with 16 μg/Ml. (B) Chemical structure of the new biosurfactants produced from the conjugation between mono and di-ramnolipids complex with the amino acid arginine, resulting in the mixture RLMIX_Arg. 1: di-ramnolipids complex; 2: mono-ramnolipids complex.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Antibiofilm effect of RLMIX_Arg on the cell viability of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in 96-well plates after 48 h of incubation. * p < 0.05 compared with control / ** p < 0.01 compared with control/ *** p < 0.001 compared with control.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effect of RLMIX_Arg on preformed biofilms against methicillin-resistant S. aureus in Jelco 18G intravenous peripheral catheters after 24 h of treatment and colony-forming units (CFU) at different concentrations. (A) * p < 0.05 compared with control / ** p < 0.01 compared with control/ *** p < 0.001 compared with control/ # compared with 16 μg/ml. (B) (b.1) 2000×, scale 50 μm; (b.4) 10,000×, scale 10 μm) untreated catheter. (b.2) 2000×, scale 50 μm; (b.5) 10,000×, scale 10 μm) catheter treated with 8 μg/ml. (b.3) 2000×, scale 50 μm; (b.6) 10,000×, scale 10 μm) catheter treated with 80 μg/ml.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effect of RLMIX_Arg impregnated catheter against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). (A) Colony-forming units at different concentrations. (B) Antibiogram test using strain MRSA 2. CFU: Colony-forming units.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Effect of RLMIX_Arg against methicillin-resistant S. aureus after 24 h of treatment with RLMIX_Arg, % of propidium iodide positive cells.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Effect of RLMIX_Arg against methicillin-resistant S. aureus after 24 h of treatment with RLMIX_Arg, % of TUNEL-positive cells.

References

    1. Alarjani KM, Skalicky M. Antimicrobial resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus and its in-vitro potential inhibition efficiency. J. Infect. Public Health. 14(12), 1796–1801 (2021). - PubMed
    1. Tsuzuki S, Yu J, Matsunaga N, Ohmagari N. Length of stay, hospitalisation costs and in-hospital mortality of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in Japan. Public Health 198, 292–296 (2021). - PubMed
    1. Shrestha P, Cooper BS, Coast Jet al. Enumerating the economic cost of antimicrobial resistance per antibiotic consumed to inform the evaluation of interventions affecting their use. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 7(1), 98 (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Idrees M, Sawant S, Karodia N, Rahman A. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm: morphology, genetics, pathogenesis and treatment strategies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18(14), 7602 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Breij A, Riool M, Cordfunke RAet al. The antimicrobial peptide SAAP-148 combats drug-resistant bacteria and biofilms. Sci. Transl. Med. [Internet]. 10(eaan4044) (2018). Available from: https://www.science.org - PubMed

MeSH terms