Effectiveness of different advanced wound dressings versus standard of care for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome
- PMID: 38864979
- DOI: 10.1007/s00592-024-02320-2
Effectiveness of different advanced wound dressings versus standard of care for the management of diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome
Abstract
Aim: to assess the effects of advanced wound dressings (AWD) commonly used in the treatment of predominantly neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) The present meta-analysis was designed to support the development of the Italian Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome (DFS).
Methods: A Medline and Embase search were performed up to April 1st, 2024 collecting all RCTs including diabetic patients or reporting subgroup analyses on diabetic patients with DFU comparing AWD with placebo/standard of care (SoC), with a duration of at least 12 weeks. Prespecified endpoints were: ulcer healing (principal), time-to-healing, frequency of dressings change, major and minor amputation, pain, and all-cause mortality. AWD assessed were: alginates; foam, hydrocolloids, hydrogels, hyaluronic acid, hemoglobin spray, silver-impregnated, sucrose octasulfate-impregnated, honey-impregnated, micro-organism-binding, and protease-modulating matrix dressings. Mantel-Haenzel Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (MH-OR, 95% CIs) were either calculated or extracted directly from the publications. Weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% CIs were calculated for continuous variables.
Results: Fifteen studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Participants treated with AWD had a significantly higher ulcer healing rate and shorter time-to-healing in comparison with SoC/placebo (MH-OR 1.50 [0.80, 2.79], p = 0.20 and WMD:: - 24.38 [- 42.90, - 5.86] days, p = 0.010). No other significant effect on the above reported prespecified endpoints were observed. For the primary endpoint, the quality of evidence was rated as "moderate".
Conclusions: In conclusion, AWD, particularly sucrose-octasulfate, hydrogels, hyaluronic acid, and honey dressings, can actively promote wound healing and shortening time-to-healing in patients with DFU.
Keywords: Advanced wound dressings; Diabetic foot ulcers; Guidelines; Meta-analysis; Ulcer healing.
© 2024. Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: MM received speaking fees from Zuccato S.r.l. and Athena. The other authors do not have any direct relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. Research involving human participants and/or animals: This article contains no studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent: No informed consent is needed.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of most common adjuvant wound treatments (skin substitutes, negative pressure wound therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, platelet-rich plasma/fibrin, and growth factors) for the management of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian Guidelines for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome.Acta Diabetol. 2025 Jul;62(7):1081-1095. doi: 10.1007/s00592-024-02426-7. Epub 2024 Dec 26. Acta Diabetol. 2025. PMID: 39724338
-
Sucrose Octasulfate-Impregnated Dressings for Adults With Difficult-to-Heal Noninfected Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Difficult-to-Heal Noninfected Venous Leg Ulcers: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2024 May 8;24(4):1-101. eCollection 2024. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2024. PMID: 39070301 Free PMC article.
-
Recurrence rates after healing in patients with neuroischemic diabetic foot ulcers healed with and without sucrose octasulfate-impregnated dressings: A 1-year comparative prospective study.Int Wound J. 2024 Oct;21(10):e70028. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70028. Int Wound J. 2024. PMID: 39358920 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Silver Dressings on Wound Healing Rate in Patients with Lower Extremity Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Med Princ Pract. 2025;34(1):13-24. doi: 10.1159/000541331. Epub 2024 Sep 9. Med Princ Pract. 2025. PMID: 39250909 Free PMC article.
-
Bypass surgery versus endovascular revascularization for occlusive infrainguinal peripheral artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for the development of the Italian Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome.Acta Diabetol. 2024 Jan;61(1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02185-x. Epub 2023 Oct 4. Acta Diabetol. 2024. PMID: 37792028 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficacy and safety of a bio-absorbable antibiotic delivery in calcium sulphate granules for the treatment of osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic foot: A randomized, double blinded, controlled clinical study The BIG D-FOOT study.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 May;27(5):2552-2560. doi: 10.1111/dom.16254. Epub 2025 Feb 19. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025. PMID: 39972526 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Aronson R, Chu L, Joseph N, Brown R (2021) Prevalence and risk evaluation of diabetic complications of the foot among adults with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in a large Canadian population (PEDAL Study). Can J Diabetes 45(7):588–593 (in Eng). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.11.011 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Morbach S, Furchert H, Gröblinghoff U et al (2012) Long-term prognosis of diabetic foot patients and their limbs: amputation and death over the course of a decade. Diabetes Care 35(10):2021–2027 (in Eng). https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0200 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Elgzyri T, Larsson J, Nyberg P, Thörne J, Eriksson KF, Apelqvist J (2014) Early revascularization after admittance to a diabetic foot center affects the healing probability of ischemic foot ulcer in patients with diabetes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 48(4):440–446 (in Eng). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.06.041 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tan JS, Friedman NM, Hazelton-Miller C, Flanagan JP, File TM Jr (1996) Can aggressive treatment of diabetic foot infections reduce the need for above-ankle amputation? Clin Infect Dis 23(2):286–291 (in Eng). https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/23.2.286 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Meloni M, Giurato L, Monge L et al (2024) Effect of a multidisciplinary team approach in patients with diabetic foot ulcers on major adverse limb events (MALEs): systematic review and meta-analysis for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome. Acta Diabetol (in Eng). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-024-02246-9 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous