Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 12:12:e54811.
doi: 10.2196/54811.

Evaluating the Prevalence of Burnout Among Health Care Professionals Related to Electronic Health Record Use: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Evaluating the Prevalence of Burnout Among Health Care Professionals Related to Electronic Health Record Use: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yuxuan Wu et al. JMIR Med Inform. .

Abstract

Background: Burnout among health care professionals is a significant concern, with detrimental effects on health care service quality and patient outcomes. The use of the electronic health record (EHR) system has been identified as a significant contributor to burnout among health care professionals.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the prevalence of burnout among health care professionals associated with the use of the EHR system, thereby providing evidence to improve health information systems and develop strategies to measure and mitigate burnout.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for English-language peer-reviewed articles published between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2022. Two independent reviewers applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, and study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses were performed using R (version 4.1.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing), with EndNote X7 (Clarivate) for reference management.

Results: The review included 32 cross-sectional studies and 5 case-control studies with a total of 66,556 participants, mainly physicians and registered nurses. The pooled prevalence of burnout among health care professionals in cross-sectional studies was 40.4% (95% CI 37.5%-43.2%). Case-control studies indicated a higher likelihood of burnout among health care professionals who spent more time on EHR-related tasks outside work (odds ratio 2.43, 95% CI 2.31-2.57).

Conclusions: The findings highlight the association between the increased use of the EHR system and burnout among health care professionals. Potential solutions include optimizing EHR systems, implementing automated dictation or note-taking, employing scribes to reduce documentation burden, and leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance EHR system efficiency and reduce the risk of burnout.

Trial registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42021281173; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021281173.

Keywords: EHR; alert fatigue; burnout; clinical decision support system; clinician burnout; electronic health record; electronic medical record; health care professionals; health care service; health informatics; health information system; health information technology; meta-analysis; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study selection. EHR: electronic health record.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the pooled prevalence of burnout among health care professionals across cross-sectional studies [6,30-60]. IV: inverse variance methods.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Measurement tool subgroup analysis of the pooled prevalence of burnout among health care professionals in cross-sectional studies [6,30-60]. IV: inverse variance methods; MBI: Maslach Burnout Inventory.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of the association between the time spent using EHR and the risk of burnout [61-65]. EHR: electronic health record; IV: inverse variance methods; OR: odds ratio; SE: standard error of the TE; TE: take the logarithm of the effect value.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aldosari B. Patients' safety in the era of EMR/EHR automation. Inform Med Unlocked. 2017;9:230–233. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2017.10.001. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235291481730148X?via%... - DOI
    1. Gatiti P, Ndirangu E, Mwangi J, Mwanzu A, Ramadhani T. Enhancing healthcare quality in hospitals through electronic health records: a systematic review. J Health Inform Dev Ctries. 2021;15(2):1–25. https://ecommons.aku.edu/libraries/64/
    1. Woldemariam MT, Jimma W. Adoption of electronic health record systems to enhance the quality of healthcare in low-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Jun;30(1):e100704. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100704. https://informatics.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=37308185 bmjhci-2022-100704 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li C, Parpia C, Sriharan A, Keefe DT. Electronic medical record-related burnout in healthcare providers: a scoping review of outcomes and interventions. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 19;12(8):e060865. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060865. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=35985785 bmjopen-2022-060865 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heponiemi T, Gluschkoff K, Vehko T, Kaihlanen AM, Saranto K, Nissinen S, Nadav J, Kujala S. Electronic health record implementations and insufficient training endanger nurses' well-being: cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 23;23(12):e27096. doi: 10.2196/27096. https://www.jmir.org/2021/12/e27096/ v23i12e27096 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources