Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jun 12;19(6):e0286361.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286361. eCollection 2024.

Randomized trial to compare acceptability of magnesium sulphate administration for preeclampsia and eclampsia: Springfusor pump versus standard of care

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized trial to compare acceptability of magnesium sulphate administration for preeclampsia and eclampsia: Springfusor pump versus standard of care

Sam Ononge et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Introduction: In low-resource settings, magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) for preeclampsia is administered majorly through an injection into the gluteal muscles 4-hourly for 24 hours. The repeated injections are very painful and may lead to infection, abscess formation, and reduced compliance.

Objective: To determine the acceptability of Springfusor® pump for the administration of Magnesium Sulphate in preeclampsia and eclampsia.

Design: Randomized Open Label Clinical Trial.

Methods: The study was conducted at Kawempe National Referral Hospital. Eligible women had a systolic blood pressure of ≥140mmHg and or diastolic blood pressure >90mmHg, proteinuria ≥+1, and the physician's decision to start on MgSO4. Four-hundred-ninety-six participants were randomized to a Springfusor® pump group (n = 248) or control (standard of care) (n = 248) administration of MgSO4. Intervention group had a loading dose (4gm of 50% MgSO4 intravenously over 20 minutes) and maintenance therapy (1gm of 50% MgSO4 intravenously per hour for 24 hours) administered using the Springfusor®. The standard of care (SOC) group received a loading dose of 4gm of 20% MgSO4 IV over 15-20 minutes, followed by 10gm of 50% MgSO4 intramuscular (5gm in each buttock) and a maintenance dose of 5gm of 50% MgSO4 was administered IM every 4 hours for 24 hours. Both arms received the rest of the care for preeclampsia/eclampsia as per the hospital guidelines. Acceptability of the method of administration was assessed using a Likert scale (1-5; 1 and 2: acceptable and 3-5: unacceptable). Pain at the site of MgSO4 administration was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale 1-7, (1 minimal pain and 7 worst pain). Comparisons were assessed with the Chi-square test, Mann Whitney-Wilcoxon test, and Students' t-test.

Results: Intervention arm; was more acceptable than the standard of care arm, (95.3% vs70.3%; p<0.001), had a lower median pain score, (2(CI: 2-2), vs 4(CI: 4-5) p<0.001), and fewer side effects. Maternal mortality was comparable between groups (0.8% in the intervention arm vs 1.2% in the IM arm).

Trial registration: Trial No PACTR201712002887266 (https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Consort diagram showing participants flow.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The Springfusor pump with a 10 ml syringe, and flow control tubing (FCT).
The Springfusor pump applies constant pressure to a syringe using a simple spring mechanism. The infusion rate is determined by a specific FCT, which provides consistent resistance to produce a steady flow. The FCT for the loading dose delivers 4 grams of 50% MgSO4 over 20 minutes, while the one for maintenance dose administration delivers 4 grams of 50% MgSO4 over 4 hours.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Showing participant with Springfusor pump with magnesium sulphate administered through a cannula.
The neck suspension string on the patient’s neck enables participants mobility without fear of dislodging the cannula.

Similar articles

References

    1. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2000;183(1):S1–S22. . - PubMed
    1. Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Seminars in perinatology. 2009;33(3):130–7. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.02.010 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Awor S, Abola B, Byanyima R, Orach CG, Kiondo P, Kaye DK, et al.. Prediction of pre-eclampsia at St. Mary’s hospital lacor, a low-resource setting in northern Uganda, a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2023;23(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05420-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mousa A, Mandili RL, Aljahdali M, Gari S, Khaimi S, Alahdal S, et al.. Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Preeclampsia With and Without Severe Features in King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study. Cureus. 2022;14(11):e31013. Epub 2022/12/08. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31013 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9717715. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tuncalp O, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al.. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet Global health. 2014;2(6):e323–33. Epub 2014/08/12. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances