Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 15:186:86-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.05.037. Epub 2024 Jun 11.

Investigation of U.S. landfill GHG reporting program methane emission models

Affiliations

Investigation of U.S. landfill GHG reporting program methane emission models

Benjamin M Stark et al. Waste Manag. .

Abstract

As part of its commitment to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the U.S. annually develops a national estimate of methane emissions from municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills by aggregating activity data from each facility. Since 2010, the U.S. has reported a 20 % decrease in MSW landfill emissions despite a 21 % increase in tons disposed. Operator-submitted data were investigated to understand the causes of this decline. In the U.S., operators of landfills with a gas collection and control system (GCCS) calculate their facility's emissions via two separate approaches - (1) first-order decay (FOD) and (2) collection efficiency assumption (CEA) - and select either result to feed into the annual inventory. The FOD model predicts methane generation proportional to waste disposal and that approach calculated a 19 % increase in total methane generated from 2010 to 2022, whereas generation via the CEA approach decreased by 8.9 %. The amount of measured methane collected has increased 7.5 % for the same years. Discrepancies between the two models' generated methane, assumed gas collection efficiencies, and oxidized methane compound into substantive differences in national estimates. Operators more frequently select the CEA method, which results in decreased national estimates. If only the FOD method was used, U.S. MSW landfill emissions would be 1.3-1.7 times greater than current estimates which is similar to recent extrapolations from remote sensing campaigns in the U.S. Both models contain parameters with large inherent uncertainty. Without measurement methods that continuously quantify both point-source and diffuse emissions, an assessment of either equation's accuracy cannot be made.

Keywords: Emission; Greenhouse gas; Inventory; Landfill; Methane; Municipal solid waste.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

References

    1. 40 CFR 60 Subpart XXX. Standards of Performance for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills That Commenced Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification After July 17, 2014. 2016. Code of Federal Regulations. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-98/sub....
    1. 40 CFR 98 Subpart HH. Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. 2016. United States Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-98/sub....
    1. Amini HR, Reinhart DR, Mackie KR, 2012. Determination of first-order landfill gas modeling parameters and uncertainties. Waste Manag 32 (2), 305–316. 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amini HR, Reinhart DR, Niskanen A, 2013. Comparison of first-order-decay modeled and actual field measured municipal solid waste landfill methane data. Waste Manag 33 (12), 2720–2728. 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.025. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barlaz MA, Chanton JP, Green RB, 2009. Controls on landfill gas collection efficiency: instantaneous and lifetime performance. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc 59 (12), 1399–1404. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources