Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug;133(2):371-379.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.04.052. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

Critical airway-related incidents and near misses in anaesthesia: a qualitative study of a critical incident reporting system

Affiliations

Critical airway-related incidents and near misses in anaesthesia: a qualitative study of a critical incident reporting system

Tina H Pedersen et al. Br J Anaesth. 2024 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Many serious adverse events in anaesthesia are retrospectively rated as preventable. Anonymous reporting of near misses to a critical incident reporting system (CIRS) can identify structural weaknesses and improve quality, but incidents are often underreported.

Methods: This prospective qualitative study aimed to identify conceptions of a CIRS and reasons for underreporting at a single Swiss centre. Anaesthesia cases were screened to identify critical airway-related incidents that qualified to be reported to the CIRS. Anaesthesia providers involved in these incidents were individually interviewed. Factors that prevented or encouraged reporting of critical incidents to the CIRS were evaluated. Interview data were analysed using the Framework method.

Results: Of 3668 screened airway management procedures, 101 cases (2.8%) involved a critical incident. Saturation was reached after interviewing 21 anaesthesia providers, who had been involved in 42/101 critical incidents (41.6%). Only one incident (1.0%) had been reported to the CIRS, demonstrating significant underreporting. Interviews revealed highly variable views on the aims of the CIRS with an overall high threshold for reporting a critical incident. Factors hindering reporting of cases included concerns regarding identifiability of the reported incident and involved healthcare providers.

Conclusions: Methods to foster anonymity of reporting, such as by national rather than departmental critical incident reporting system databases, and a change in culture is required to enhance reporting of critical incidents. Institutions managing a critical incident reporting system need to ensure timely feedback to the team regarding lessons learned, consequences, and changes to standards of care owing to reported critical incidents. Consistent reporting and assessment of critical incidents is required to allow the full potential of a critical incident reporting system.

Keywords: airway management; critical incident reporting; near-miss; patient safety; qualitative study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Study flowchart. CIRS, critical incident reporting system.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Matrix of categories and codes identified through analysis by the Framework method. CIRS, critical incident reporting system.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; 2020. Patient safety incident reporting and learning systems: technical report and guidance.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240010338 Available from:
    1. Flanagan J.C. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954;51:327–358. - PubMed
    1. Blum L.L. Equipment design and “human” limitations. Anesthesiology. 1971;35:101–102. - PubMed
    1. Cooper J.B., Newbower R.S., Long C.D., McPeek B. Preventable anesthesia mishaps: a study of human factors. Anesthesiology. 1978;49:399–406. - PubMed
    1. Ahluwalia J., Marriott L. Critical incident reporting systems. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;10:31–37. - PubMed