Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Jun 12;28(1):68.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02945-z.

Stoma associated complications after diverting loop ileostomy, end ileostomy or split stoma formation after right sided colectomy-a retrospective cohort study (StoComSplit Analysis)

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Stoma associated complications after diverting loop ileostomy, end ileostomy or split stoma formation after right sided colectomy-a retrospective cohort study (StoComSplit Analysis)

B Wiesler et al. Tech Coloproctol. .

Abstract

Background: For high-risk patients receiving right-sided colectomy, stoma formation is a safety strategy. Options are anastomosis with loop ileostomy, end ileostomy, or split stoma. The aim is to compare the outcome of these three options.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent right sided colectomy and stoma formation between January 2008 and December 2021 at two tertial referral centers in Switzerland. The primary outcome was the stoma associated complication rate within one year.

Results: A total of 116 patients were included. A total of 20 patients (17%) underwent primary anastomosis with loop ileostomy (PA group), 29 (25%) received an end ileostomy (ES group) and 67 (58%) received a split stoma (SS group). Stoma associated complication rate was 43% (n = 21) in PA and in ES group and 50% (n = 34) in SS group (n.s.). A total of 30% (n = 6) of patients in PA group needed reoperations, whereas 59% (n = 17) in ES and 58% (n = 39) in SS group had reoperations (P = 0.07). Wound infections occurred in 15% (n = 3) in PA, in 10% (n = 3) in ES, and in 30% (n = 20) in SS group (P = 0.08). A total of 13 patients (65%) in PA, 7 (24%) in ES, and 29 (43%) in SS group achieved stoma closure (P = 0.02). A total of 5 patients (38%) in PA group, 2 (15%) in ES, and 22 patients (67%) in SS group had a stoma-associated rehospitalization (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Primary anastomosis and loop ileostomy may be an option for selected patients. Patients with end ileostomies have fewer stoma-related readmissions than those with a split stoma, but they have a lower rate of stoma closure.

Clinical trial registration: Trial not registered.

Keywords: Colorectal surgery; End ileostomy; Loop ileostomy; Ostomy formation; Right sided resection; Split stoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kim J, Mittal R, Konyalian V, King J, Stamos MJ, Kumar RR (2007) Outcome analysis of patients undergoing colorectal resection for emergent and elective indications. Am Surg 73(10):991–993 - PubMed
    1. Amelung FJ, Consten ECJ, Siersema PD, Tanis PJ (2016) A population-based analysis of three treatment modalities for malignant obstruction of the proximal colon: acute resection versus stent or stoma as a bridge to surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 23(11):3660–3668 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steele SR, Maykel JA, Wexner SD (2020) Clinical decision making in colorectal surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, Switzerland, pp 667–675. 10.1007/978-3-319-65942-8
    1. Kingham TP, Pachter HL (2009) Colonic anastomotic leak: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 208(2):269–278 - PubMed
    1. Leichtle SW, Mouawad NJ, Welch KB, Lampman RM, Cleary RK (2012) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 55(5):569–575 - PubMed

Publication types