Minimally invasive surgeries for spontaneous hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (MISICH): a multicenter randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 38867192
- PMCID: PMC11170771
- DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03468-y
Minimally invasive surgeries for spontaneous hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (MISICH): a multicenter randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a common stroke type with high morbidity and mortality. There are mainly three surgical methods for treating ICH. Unfortunately, thus far, no specific surgical method has been proven to be the most effective. We carried out this study to investigate whether minimally invasive surgeries with endoscopic surgery or stereotactic aspiration (frameless navigated aspiration) will improve functional outcomes in patients with supratentorial ICH compared with small-bone flap craniotomy.
Methods: In this parallel-group multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted at 16 centers, patients with supratentorial hypertensive ICH were randomized to receive endoscopic surgery, stereotactic aspiration, or craniotomy at a 1:1:1 ratio from July 2016 to June 2022. The follow-up duration was 6 months. Patients were randomized to receive endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration, or small-bone flap craniotomy. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at the 6-month follow-up.
Results: A total of 733 patients were randomly allocated to three groups: 243 to the endoscopy group, 247 to the aspiration group, and 243 to the craniotomy group. Finally, 721 patients (239 in the endoscopy group, 246 in the aspiration group, and 236 in the craniotomy group) received treatment and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Primary efficacy analysis revealed that 73 of 219 (33.3%) in the endoscopy group, 72 of 220 (32.7%) in the aspiration group, and 47 of 212 (22.2%) in the craniotomy group achieved favorable functional outcome at the 6-month follow-up (P = .017). We got similar results in subgroup analysis of deep hemorrhages, while in lobar hemorrhages the prognostic outcome was similar among three groups. Old age, deep hematoma location, large hematoma volume, low preoperative GCS score, craniotomy, and intracranial infection were associated with greater odds of unfavorable outcomes. The mean hospitalization expenses were ¥92,420 in the endoscopy group, ¥77,351 in the aspiration group, and ¥100,947 in the craniotomy group (P = .000).
Conclusions: Compared with small bone flap craniotomy, endoscopic surgery and stereotactic aspiration improved the long-term outcome of hypertensive ICH, especially deep hemorrhages.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02811614.
Keywords: Endoscopic surgery; Intracerebral hemorrhage; Minimally invasive surgery; Randomized controlled trial; Small-bone flap craniotomy; Stereotactic aspiration.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Comparison of endoscopic evacuation, stereotactic aspiration and craniotomy for the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral haemorrhage: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2017 Jun 28;18(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2041-1. Trials. 2017. PMID: 28659171 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery for supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a comparison with craniotomy.J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):553-559. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS161589. Epub 2017 Apr 7. J Neurosurg. 2018. PMID: 28387618
-
Surgical Evacuation of Spontaneous Supratentorial Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Stereotactic Aspiration, Endoscopic Surgery, and Craniotomy.World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:332-340. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.134. Epub 2017 May 31. World Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 28578111
-
Neuroendoscopic Surgery versus Craniotomy for Supratentorial Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:477-488. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.115. Epub 2019 Nov 15. World Neurosurg. 2020. PMID: 31669683
-
Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020 Apr;26(2):129-136. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000695. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2020. PMID: 32004194 Review.
Cited by
-
Prognostic factors in acute hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: impact of minimally invasive puncture and drainage.Am J Transl Res. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):5371-5384. doi: 10.62347/PQPP5715. eCollection 2024. Am J Transl Res. 2024. PMID: 39544746 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive surgery for bilateral large basal ganglia hemorrhage: a rare case report and insights from literature.AME Case Rep. 2025 Jul 15;9:103. doi: 10.21037/acr-25-17. eCollection 2025. AME Case Rep. 2025. PMID: 40761214 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic surgery versus small bone window craniotomy for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.BMC Neurol. 2025 Feb 8;25(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04023-9. BMC Neurol. 2025. PMID: 39923002 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Aspiration with Catheter Insertion: Impact on Hematoma Volume and Symptom Improvement.Brain Sci. 2025 Apr 26;15(5):455. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15050455. Brain Sci. 2025. PMID: 40426625 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Review.J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 11;14(4):1155. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041155. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40004685 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical