Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jun 12;24(1):682.
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04456-7.

Comparison of the effect of licorice and chlorhexidine mouthwash on the oral health of intubated patients in the intensive care unit

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of the effect of licorice and chlorhexidine mouthwash on the oral health of intubated patients in the intensive care unit

Khodayar Oshvandi et al. BMC Oral Health. .

Abstract

Background: Chlorhexidine mouthwash is a common oral hygiene product used in intensive care units, but it may have some adverse effects. Licorice, a natural herb, could be a potential alternative to chlorhexidine. However, the effect of licorice mouthwash on the oral health of intubated patients has not been studied yet. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of licorice and chlorhexidine mouthwash on the oral health of intubated patients.

Methods: This was a triple-blind clinical trial. The sample included 130 intubated patients admitted to an intensive care unit in Iran. The samples were selected by convenience sampling and randomly assigned to two groups: A and B. In group A, the main researcher applied 15 ml of 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash after each brushing (twice a day for 5.5 days) and suctioned it after 30 s. In group B, 20% licorice mouthwash was used instead of chlorhexidine. The demographic information questionnaire and the Beck Oral Assessment Scale (BOAS) were completed by one of the nurses before and on the sixth day of the study.

Results: Finally, 60 patients in each group completed the study. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic variables or oral health before the intervention (P > 0.05). The oral health of patients in both the chlorhexidine and liquorice mouthwash groups improved significantly after the intervention (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in oral health between the two groups at postintervention (P = 0.06).

Conclusion: The results demonstrated that both mouthwashes exerted a comparable effect on dental and oral health. However, the chlorhexidine mouthwash showed a greater impact on the reduction of dental plaque and the thinning of saliva compared to licorice mouthwash. In essential cases, licorice mouthwash can be employed as an alternative to chlorhexidine.

Keywords: Chlorhexidine; Glycyrrhiza; Intensive care units; Mouthwashes; Nurses; Oral health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow diagram based on the Consort statement of the year 2010

Similar articles

References

    1. Singh P, Arshad Z, Srivastava VK, Singh GP, Gangwar RS, Singh Sr P, Srivastava VK. Efficacy of oral care protocols in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. Cureus. 2022;14(4). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cillóniz C, Torres A, Niederman MS. Management of pneumonia in critically ill patients. BMJ. 2021;375:1–24. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-065871. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Irani H, Mofrad ZP, Navidian A, Dahmardeh AR. Comparing the Effect of Salvadora Persica Chewing Stick (miswak) and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash on oral health in patients hospitalized in Intensive Care Units. J Crit Care Nurs. 2018;12(3):43–50.
    1. Scannapieco FA. Poor oral health in the etiology and prevention of aspiration pneumonia. Clin Geriatr Med. 2023;39(2):257–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.01.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sole ML, Klein DG, Moseley MJ. Introduction to critical care nursing E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2020.

Publication types