Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jun 13;18(1):277.
doi: 10.1186/s13256-024-04474-7.

Giant complete hydatidiform mole: a case report and review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Giant complete hydatidiform mole: a case report and review of the literature

Iris Bonomo et al. J Med Case Rep. .

Abstract

Background: This case describes the youngest patient documented in the literature who presented with a giant hydatidiform mole, effectively addressed through conservative treatment.

Case presentation: Our department received a 20-year-old Caucasian patient who was admitted due to significant metrorrhagia in an undisclosed pregnancy. During examination, we identified a massive, highly vascularized hydatidiform mole measuring 22 cm (cm). We performed a surgical dilatation and curettage. The anatomopathological findings confirmed the presence of a complete hydatidiform mole (CHM). Following the established guidelines, we conducted weekly monitoring of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). Unfortunately, the patient discontinued the follow-up and became pregnant again before achieving hCG negativation.

Conclusion: This case suggests that conservative treatment is a viable option regardless of the size of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), especially when the preservation of fertility is a crucial consideration, as effectively demonstrated in our case.

Keywords: Case report; Gestational trophoblastic disease; Human chorionic gonadotropin; Hydatidiform mole; Molar pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preoperative thoracoabdominal CT scan
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Dilatation and curettage under ultrasound guidance
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Uterine contents after curettage

Similar articles

References

    1. Shaaban AM, Rezvani M, Haroun RR, Kennedy AM, Elsayes KM, Olpin JD, et al. Gestational trophoblastic disease: clinical and imaging features. Radiographics. 2017;37(2):681–700. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160140. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ning F, Hou H, Morse AN, Lash GE. Understanding and management of gestational trophoblastic disease. F1000Research. 2019;8:428. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14953.1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nadhan R, Vaman JV, Nirmala C, Kumar Sengodan S, Krishnakumar Hemalatha S, Rajan A, et al. Insights into dovetailing GTD and cancers. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;114:77–90. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.04.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Horowitz NS, Eskander RN, Adelman MR, Burke W. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology evidenced-based review and recommendation. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;163(3):605–613. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ngan HYS, Seckl MJ, Berkowitz RS, Xiang Y, Golfier F, Sekharan PK, et al. Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2021 update. Obstet Anesth Dig. 2023;43(1):8–9. doi: 10.1097/01.aoa.0000912224.58015.e6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances