Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 12:15589447241257646.
doi: 10.1177/15589447241257646. Online ahead of print.

Characterizing the Timing of Surgical Repair of Congenital Hand Differences in the United States

Affiliations

Characterizing the Timing of Surgical Repair of Congenital Hand Differences in the United States

Olivia W Cummings et al. Hand (N Y). .

Abstract

Background: Suggested timing of reconstruction of congenital hand differences varies widely. The goal of timely intervention is to achieve near-normal appearance and function. We evaluated national trends in surgical timing of congenital hand differences to determine whether interventions align with the literature. Methods: Recommended ages for surgical reconstruction were identified. The Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried from 2012 to 2020 for children who underwent surgery for simple syndactyly (SS), complex syndactyly (CS), polydactyly, or congenital trigger finger. Subgroup analysis was conducted to assess whether the surgeon's subspecialty (plastic surgery vs orthopedic surgery, pediatric vs generalist) influenced the timing of repair. Results: Congenital trigger finger and CS reconstructions occurred largely within the recommended age range (73.8% and 52.2%, respectively). Polydactyly repairs primarily occurred earlier than the recommendations (54.0%). Timing of SS reconstruction was split, either occurring before (44.3%) or after (41.4%) the recommendations. For children with polydactyly, plastic surgeons were more likely to perform polydactyly reconstruction at a younger age compared with orthopedic surgeons (P = .0001). Conclusions: Established expert recommendations for the treatment of congenital hand differences are largely not followed in practice in the United States. This suggests that practice patterns may not be determined by the surgical literature.

Keywords: congential hand differences; health outcomes; pediatric hand reconstruction trends; pediatric surgery quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Stuck Together: A Systematic Review of Hand Syndactyly.
    Gowrie S, Omosebi O, Veith P, Agarwal N, Shah S, Montalbano M, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. Gowrie S, et al. Cureus. 2025 Apr 9;17(4):e81943. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81943. eCollection 2025 Apr. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40206497 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Ahmed H, Akbari H, Emami A, et al.. Genetic overview of syndactyly and polydactyly. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(11):e1549. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer AS, Bae DS. Pediatric trigger digits. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(11):2304-2309; quiz 2309. - PubMed
    1. Steenwerckx A, De Smet L, Fabry G. Congenital trigger digit. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21(5):909-911. - PubMed
    1. Cardon LJ, Ezaki M, Carter PR. Trigger finger in children. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24(6):1156-1161. - PubMed
    1. Wolfe SW, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, et al.. Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. Elsevier; 2021.

LinkOut - more resources