Characterizing the Timing of Surgical Repair of Congenital Hand Differences in the United States
- PMID: 38867500
- PMCID: PMC11571587
- DOI: 10.1177/15589447241257646
Characterizing the Timing of Surgical Repair of Congenital Hand Differences in the United States
Abstract
Background: Suggested timing of reconstruction of congenital hand differences varies widely. The goal of timely intervention is to achieve near-normal appearance and function. We evaluated national trends in surgical timing of congenital hand differences to determine whether interventions align with the literature. Methods: Recommended ages for surgical reconstruction were identified. The Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried from 2012 to 2020 for children who underwent surgery for simple syndactyly (SS), complex syndactyly (CS), polydactyly, or congenital trigger finger. Subgroup analysis was conducted to assess whether the surgeon's subspecialty (plastic surgery vs orthopedic surgery, pediatric vs generalist) influenced the timing of repair. Results: Congenital trigger finger and CS reconstructions occurred largely within the recommended age range (73.8% and 52.2%, respectively). Polydactyly repairs primarily occurred earlier than the recommendations (54.0%). Timing of SS reconstruction was split, either occurring before (44.3%) or after (41.4%) the recommendations. For children with polydactyly, plastic surgeons were more likely to perform polydactyly reconstruction at a younger age compared with orthopedic surgeons (P = .0001). Conclusions: Established expert recommendations for the treatment of congenital hand differences are largely not followed in practice in the United States. This suggests that practice patterns may not be determined by the surgical literature.
Keywords: congential hand differences; health outcomes; pediatric hand reconstruction trends; pediatric surgery quality improvement.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Incidence of Acute Complications Following Surgery for Syndactyly and Polydactyly: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database from 2012 to 2014.J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Sep;42(9):749.e1-749.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 23. J Hand Surg Am. 2017. PMID: 28648327
-
Pediatric Hand Fractures and Congenital Differences: An Analysis of Data From the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery and the American Board of Plastic Surgery.J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Feb;47(2):191.e1-191.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 May 22. J Hand Surg Am. 2022. PMID: 34030932
-
National Patterns in Surgical Management of Syndactyly: A Review of 956 Cases.Hand (N Y). 2020 Sep;15(5):666-673. doi: 10.1177/1558944719828003. Epub 2019 Feb 15. Hand (N Y). 2020. PMID: 30770023 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Common Pediatric Congenital Conditions of the Hand.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Aug;136(2):241e-257e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001499. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015. PMID: 26218399 Review.
-
International guidelines for groin hernia management.Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12. Hernia. 2018. PMID: 29330835 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Stuck Together: A Systematic Review of Hand Syndactyly.Cureus. 2025 Apr 9;17(4):e81943. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81943. eCollection 2025 Apr. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40206497 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bauer AS, Bae DS. Pediatric trigger digits. J Hand Surg Am. 2015;40(11):2304-2309; quiz 2309. - PubMed
-
- Steenwerckx A, De Smet L, Fabry G. Congenital trigger digit. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21(5):909-911. - PubMed
-
- Cardon LJ, Ezaki M, Carter PR. Trigger finger in children. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24(6):1156-1161. - PubMed
-
- Wolfe SW, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, et al.. Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. Elsevier; 2021.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources