Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;44(11):1208-1226.
doi: 10.1177/0271678X241261944. Epub 2024 Jun 13.

Cerebral autoregulation in pediatric and neonatal intensive care: A scoping review

Affiliations

Cerebral autoregulation in pediatric and neonatal intensive care: A scoping review

Marta Fedriga et al. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Deranged cerebral autoregulation (CA) is associated with worse outcome in adult brain injury. Strategies for monitoring CA and maintaining the brain at its 'best CA status' have been implemented, however, this approach has not yet developed for the paediatric population. This scoping review aims to find up-to-date evidence on CA assessment in children and neonates with a view to identify patient categories in which CA has been measured so far, CA monitoring methods and its relationship with clinical outcome if any. A literature search was conducted for studies published within 31st December 2022 in 3 bibliographic databases. Out of 494 papers screened, this review includes 135 studies. Our literature search reveals evidence for CA measurement in the paediatric population across different diagnostic categories and age groups. The techniques adopted, indices and thresholds used to assess and define CA are heterogeneous. We discuss the relevance of available evidence for CA assessment in the paediatric population. However, due to small number of studies and heterogeneity of methods used, there is no conclusive evidence to support universal adoption of CA monitoring, technique, and methodology. This calls for further work to understand the clinical impact of CA monitoring in paediatric and neonatal intensive care.

Keywords: Cerebral autoregulation; cerebrovascular reactivity; neonatal intensive care; paediatric intensive care; pressure reactivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Peter Smielewski and Marek Czosnyka receive part of the licensing fees for ICM+ software, licensed by Cambridge Enterprise Ltd, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Autoregulatory curve. Autoregulation curve combined changes in LDF (laser doppler flow) (blue) and RBC (red blood cells) flux (red) for 10 hypotensive and 10 hypertensive piglet experiments plotted against CPP. Grey shading represents the standard error (for the LDF data curve there was no visible standard error). Dotted lines show the mean lower and upper limits of autoregulation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PRISMA diagram. It maps out the different research phases and the papers in the review process.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Autoregulation monitoring in a neonate post-cardiac surgery. Signals from invasive arterial blood pressure and cerebral NIRS with INVOSTM were collected using ICM+ software (University of Cambridge, UK) for continuous Cox calculation (Figure 1(a)). A multi-window weighted algorithm based on 8-hour epochs was used to obtain the autoregulation U-shaped curve (Figure 1(b)). Figure 1(c) shows the time trends of COx-derived optimal MAP (mean arterial blood pressure), LLA (lower limit of autoregulation) and ULA (upper limit of autoregulation). The percentage of time spent with COx > 0.3 and MAP < LLA or MAP > ULA were provided as COx-derived metrics aimed to quantify the cumulative burden of the episodes with impaired CA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Joseph D, Marcel JA, Marek C. Further understanding of cerebral autoregulation at the bedside: possible implications for future therapy. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 2014; 15: 169–185. - PubMed
    1. Peterson EC, Wang Z, Britz G. Regulation of cerebral blood flow. Int J Vasc Med 2011; 2011: 823525. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jurgen AHRC, Dick HJT, Ronney BP, et al. Regulation of cerebral blood flow in humans: physiology and clinical implications of autoregulation. Physiological Reviews 2021; 101: 1487–1559. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fog M. The relationship between the blood pressure and the tonic regulation of the pial arteries. J Neurol Psychiatry 1938; 1: 187–197. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lassen NA. Cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in man. Physiol Rev 1959; 39: 183–238. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources