Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 2;51(3):131-139.
doi: 10.1159/000537789. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Experimental Data on PIRCHE and T-Cell Reactivity: HLA-DPB1-Derived Peptides Identified by PIRCHE-I Show Binding to HLA-A*02:01 in vitro and T-Cell Activation in vivo

Affiliations

Experimental Data on PIRCHE and T-Cell Reactivity: HLA-DPB1-Derived Peptides Identified by PIRCHE-I Show Binding to HLA-A*02:01 in vitro and T-Cell Activation in vivo

Emma T M Peereboom et al. Transfus Med Hemother. .

Abstract

Introduction: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DPB1 mismatches during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with an unrelated donor result in an increased risk for the development of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The number of CD8+ T-cell epitopes available for indirect allorecognition as predicted by the PIRCHE algorithm has been shown to be associated with GvHD development. As a proof of principle, PIRCHE-I predictions for HLA-DPB1 mismatches were validated in vitro and in vivo.

Methods: PIRCHE-I analysis was performed to identify HLA-DPB1-derived peptides that could theoretically bind to HLA-A*02:01. PIRCHE-I predictions for HLA-DPB1 mismatches were validated in vitro by investigating binding affinities of HLA-DPB1-derived peptides to the HLA-A*02:01 in a competition-based binding assay. To investigate the capacity of HLA-DPB1-derived peptides to elicit a T-cell response in vivo, mice were immunized with these peptides. T-cell alloreactivity was subsequently evaluated using an interferon-gamma ELISpot assay.

Results: The PIRCHE-I algorithm identified five HLA-DPB1-derived peptides (RMCRHNYEL, YIYNREEFV, YIYNREELV, YIYNREEYA, and YIYNRQEYA) to be presented by HLA-A*02:01. Binding of these peptides to HLA-A*02:01 was confirmed in a competition-based peptide binding assay, all showing an IC50 value of 21 μm or lower. The peptides elicited an interferon-gamma response in vivo.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that the PIRCHE-I algorithm can identify potential immunogenic HLA-DPB1-derived peptides present in recipients of an HLA-DPB1-mismatched donor. These combined in vitro and in vivo observations strengthen the validity of the PIRCHE-I algorithm to identify HLA-DPB1 mismatch-related GvHD development upon HSCT.

Keywords: Graft-versus-host disease; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Human leukocyte antigen-DPB1; Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA Epitopes-I; T-cell epitopes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose. The UMC Utrecht has filed a patent application on the prediction of an alloimmune response against mismatched HLA. E.S. is listed as an inventor on these patents. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Overview of HLA types used as inputs for the PIRCHE algorithm. a HLA-DPB1 allele frequencies in the DKMS cohort (20). DPB1 alleles with an allele frequency <0.02 (15.65%) include the following HLA-DPB1 alleles with an allele frequency higher than 0.1%: DPB1*05:01, DPB1*13:01, DPB1*17:01, DPB1*10:01, DPB1*14:01, DPB1*11:01, DPB1*06:01, DPB1*19:01, DPB1*09:01, DPB1*15:01, DPB1*23:01, DPB1*16:01, DPB1*20:01, and DPB1*02:02. b Example of the input for the PIRCHE algorithm. Depicted is the first patient genotype, which included the HLA-DPB1*04:01 allele, combined with 19 different donors with the same HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 alleles, but differing in their HLA-DPB1 allele. The other 18 patient genotypes consisted of the same HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 typing, but differed in their HLA-DPB1 allele (not shown).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Log dose-inhibition curves with indicated IC50 values from the inhibition data of all test peptides (b–f) and negative and positive control peptides (g, h) for the HLA-A*02:01 allele. IC50 values for binding to HLA-A*02:01 were obtained by performing nonlinear regression analysis on the inhibition data of all peptides. Error bars indicate standard deviations. a Overview of the log dose-inhibition curves of all tested peptides including negative and positive control peptides shows variation in binding affinities between the five tested HLA-DPB1-derived peptides. b–f Log-inhibition curves for HLA-A*02:01 binding of RMCRHNYEL (b), YIYNREEFV (c), YIYNREELV (d), YIYNREEYA (e), and YIYNRQEYA (f) peptides having IC50 values of 21.0 μm, 4.9 μm, 3.9 μm, 10.6 μm, and 19.9 μm, respectively. g, h Log-inhibition curves for HLA-A*02:01 binding of negative (KVNVSPSKK) (g) and positive (VLHDDLLEA) (h) control peptides. The negative control peptide did not show any binding to the HLA-A*02:01 allele and the positive control peptide showed binding to HLA-A*02:01 with an IC50 value of 3.9 μm.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
HLA-DPB1-derived peptides RMCRHNYEL, YIYNREEFV, YIYNREELV, and YIYNRQEYA loaded on T2A2 cells elicited a T-cell response in HLA-A*02:01 transgenic mice. T-cell alloreactivity against immunized HLA-DPB1-derived peptides in HLA-A*02:01 mice was examined using an IFN-γ ELISpot assay with peptide-loaded T2A2 cells. Spot-forming cells for the immunized peptides were corrected for the mean signal from a nonimmunized control peptide (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).

Similar articles

References

    1. Shaw BE, Arguello R, Garcia-Sepulveda CA, Madrigal JA. The impact of HLA genotyping on survival following unrelated donor haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: review. Br J Haematol. 2010;150(3):251–8. - PubMed
    1. Mangum DS, Caywood E. A clinician’s guide to HLA matching in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Hum Immunol. 2022;83(10):687–94. - PubMed
    1. Hornick P, Rose M. Transplantation immunology: methods and protocols. In: Hornick P, Rose M, editors. Methods in molecular biology Humanapress; 2006. p. 161–71.
    1. Geneugelijk K, Thus KA, Spierings E. Predicting alloreactivity in transplantation. J Immunol Res. 2014;2014:159479–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Geneugelijk K, Spierings E. Matching donor and recipient based on predicted indirectly recognizable human leucocyte antigen epitopes. Int J Immunogenet. 2018;45(2):41–53. - PubMed